Jeff Schreiber is clearly a man of sterling character and scrupulous honesty. Just ask him. But do not, under any circumstances, pay any attention to what he actually does.
Like so much of the wingnut blogosphere, Widdle Jeffie is whining about the proposed use of the self-executing rule to pass health care reform in the House. This procedure will avoid an actual House vote on the Senate’s bill, by attaching the Senate bill to a package of fixes to be passed by the House. This, apparently, is just too too much for poor widdle Jeffie, and he lets the fauxtrage flow:
Are we really surprised anymore?
That’s the question I keep coming back to, as it becomes more and more and more apparent — not that it wasn’t already abundantly clear — that the Democratic Party leadership is prepared to pay any price and bend any rule and destroy any career necessary to bring about whatever procedural nightmare will equate to passage of their radical health care reform agenda.
A brand new headline from the Washington Post, just crossing the computer a little while ago, informs us that the “House May Try to Pass Senate Health-Care Bill Without Voting On It.” I can’t help but wonder if it’s even news anymore.
…
Why should we be surprised that [House Speaker Nancy Pelosi] will look for a possibly unconstitutional, definitely improper procedural loophole to use in the process of ramming said legislation down our throat?
You know, as a guy who runs a Web site like America’s Right, I look at an article like the one in question and think to myself: “Gee whiz, Jeff … is there even any value in pointing out that Nancy Pelosi has, yet again, shown that she simply does not care what America thinks?” And part of me says “no.” Part of me believes that, for Nancy Pelosi, disregarding the will of the American people comes as naturally as breaking campaign promises does for this president. The other part of me, however, cannot help but draw attention to it all. Its maddening.
So, are we really surprised anymore? Of course not. Are we outraged? Absolutely.
There’s certainly something missing from Widdle Jeffie’s tantrum that shouldn’t surprise anyone. That would be the fact that the self-executing rule procedure that has him wetting his pants has long been a favorite of Republicans:
When Republicans took power in 1995, they soon lost their aversion to self-executing rules and proceeded to set new records under Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.). There were 38 and 52 self-executing rules in the 104th and 105th Congresses (1995-1998), making up 25 percent and 35 percent of all rules, respectively. Under Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) there were 40, 42 and 30 self-executing rules in the 106th, 107th and 108th Congresses (22 percent, 37 percent and 22 percent, respectively). Thus far in the 109th Congress, self-executing rules make up about 16 percent of all rules.
On April 26, the Rules Committee served up the mother of all self-executing rules for the lobby/ethics reform bill. The committee hit the trifecta with not one, not two, but three self-executing provisions in the same special rule. The first trigger was a double whammy: “In lieu of the amendments recommended by the Committees on the Judiciary, Rules, and Government Reform now printed in the bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of the Rules Committee Print dated April 21, 2006, modified by the amendment printed in part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted in the House and the Committee of the Whole.”
The substitute submitted by the Rules Committee did not combine all the amendments adopted by the three reporting committees, as is customarily done. Instead, it deleted two amendments adopted by the Judiciary Committee that would have required disclosure of lobbyists’ contacts with Members and staff, and lobbyists’ solicitation and transmission of campaign contributions to candidates.
It then further amended its own substitute by automatically deleting a third Judiciary amendment requiring a Government Accountability Office study of lobbyist employment contracts.
So, are we really surprised any more by Jeff Schreiber’s habit of carefully failing to mention relevant facts? Of course not.
Are we outraged? Nope.
But we are entertained. We’re pointing and laughing at “honest” Jeff Schreiber and his self-defeating, self-impeaching antics. Again.
(hat tips: Daily Kos and Media Matters)
Lately…