Comments on: Judy Doucette — ignorant and built to stay that way

By: kemibe

kemibe — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:43:34 +0000

If wingnuts didn’t have the option of filtering out contrary comments, there would be no wingnut blogs. I know of no centrist or liberal bloggers who ban or block commenters simply for saying things they don’t agree with. This is the sole purview of fucktard right-wingers who only want an online echo-chamber so they can ait their angst unmolested by reality. They’re virtually all failures in their personal lives and for whatever reason they think the political left is to blame, even those who live on the government dole.
“Big Dog” may allow dissent, but it’s hard to give him credit for letting people bash his incessantly stupid bullshit. He has one of the shittiest blogs I have ever had the displeasure of reading, and I hope he has not fathered any children, as they would have eyes on stalks and walk into at least three walls before leaving a room.

By: Adam

Adam — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:01:03 +0000

I call him a liar all the time. He doesn’t like it but he’ll argue it. Stay away from profanity and he’s usually OK about it. Blake on the other hand has severely lowered the level of discourse there though since he arrived.

By: Green Eagle

Green Eagle — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:43:59 +0000

I went and took a look. Boy is that one pathetic website, written by one pathetic human being. I got more laughs from Cao.

By: meatbrain

meatbrain — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:58:53 +0000

Not so sure I can agree with you, Adam. Try stating point blank that Big Dog lies (which he does, with gusto), and see what happens.

By: Adam

Adam — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:30:13 +0000

By He I mean Big Dog. He at least has the courage to allow decent debate on his site.

By: Adam

Adam — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:29:32 +0000

This is the way Cao and many other wing nut bloggers roll, they just don’t always admit it. At least HoosierArmyMom is up front about it. This is one He at least has the courage to allow decent debate on his site.