Comments on: Hilarious: Cao is pimping for a plagiarist

By: Laci the Dog

Laci the Dog — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:29:54 +0000

Couldn’t Cao be pronounced “Cow” as in “stupid cow”? She looks like she’s doing an imitation of Hanoi Jane in her header pic: why is a “patriotic American Woman carrying an AK-47? She looks more terrorist than patriot to me.
Cao also sound like a Charlie name: is it short for Cao Nguyen Shitbag?
No, it’s Celtic. Does she support the IRA?
She should check out Kenneth Clarke’s statement in the British Parliament bewfore saying stupid shit like the war in Iraq was justified. “I cannot rid myself of doubts that the course to war upon which we are now embarked was decided on many months ago, primarily in Washington, and there has been a fairly remorseless unfolding of events since that time. ” Members in the Commons Hansard Debates text for Wednesday 26 Feb 2003, Volume No. 400, Part No. 51.

http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200203/cmhansrd/vo030226/debtext/30226-14.htm

Kenneth Clarke was one of Thatcher’s Cabinet Ministers—hardly a screaming liberal (and neither is Boris Johnson).
Her thing on the Slutcracker shows she has no idea of Christmas traditions or that the Puritans banned Christmas for being pagan! The Slutcracker is far more of a traditional Christmas passtime.
She should also read George Monbiot’s piece on Global Warming before she pretends to act knowledgable on the subject: http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2009/12/07/the-real-climate-scandal/
She should also check out the USS LIberty before she goes around supporting Israel. One should watch their back when they stand with Israel.
And if she supports the Second Amendment for fighting government tyranny, then why does she oppose the weathermen ( Especially with the pic of her as Hanoi Jane)? Who defines tyranny anyway?
In short, Cow is indeed a stupid cow.

By: Crystal

Crystal — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:27:47 +0000

I was just over at that blog, but she has comments turned off. She made this statement
” ‘plagiarist’ for lifting parts from what Climate Progress calls ‘deep climate’ but appears to be called ‘world climate report’”
This didn’t make any sense, because she must have misread the Climate Progress blog entry. Deep climate was a blog pointing out many examples of direct and nearly direct plagiarism in the document. World Climate Report is a warming-skeptic site that had this material that they were lifting from. Climate Progress never confuses Deep Climate and WCR.

By: Adam

Adam — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:23:10 +0000

I stopped wasting my time over at Cao’s sewer a few months back. She doesn’t deal in reality at all.

I’ve also abandoned Big Dog’s blog for now though I’ll go back sooner or later. Big Dog and I are old friends but you just can’t carry on a decent argument over there with that moron Blake writing on the site. The guy has a problem using facts and reality to backup the poo he flings. Sometimes I think he must be joking because he says such stupid things…

By: Green Eagle

Green Eagle — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:21:49 +0000

Thanks for the mention above.

I seem to have been banned from Cao’s blog- of course for telling the truth. I quoted chapter and verse from Richard Evans’s books to refute her insistence that the Nazis were a bunch of leftist gay nancy boys. She replied by calling Evans a Nazi propagandist! As you can imagine, she had some rather less polite terms for me.

Boy, what a case of hard core delusion. Oh well, I was wasting my time over there. Maybe I should start in on Donald Douglas.

By: Adam

Adam — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:12:06 +0000

Meatbrain:

“Could this be some bizarre form of Tourette’s syndrome, forcing Cao to blurt out random questions having nothing whatever to do with the subject at hand?”

Cao:

“LOL you mean like the idiot who brought up homosexuality and the nazis on this subject on my blog?”

Exactly, Cao. As socketplug points out, you are the idiot that brought up the subject. At last you say something correct that we can all agree with. You are an idiot.

By: socketplug

socketplug — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:37:24 +0000

I didn't bring up homosexuality Cao, you did:

Just like Nazi Germany. And just like Nazi Germany, they are pro homosexual and cover it up - just like Nazi Germany, they are blind greens that promote failed energy sources like wind power that don’t exist in the private sector.

If you are going to assert something that is so far out of the park (namely Nazi Germany was pro homosexual) then I think I have the right to ask you to justify that position. You posted some justifications (I believe primarily from the book The Pink Swastika but I'm not sure as you did not reference your sources) which I've spent a couple of hours researching and are almost certainly false. I'd be more than happy to debate the issue with you so long as it is civil and you don't censor any posts.

By: meatbrain

meatbrain — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:45:49 +0000

Actually I have a very real purpose for continuing to ask that question.

Doubtful. The lizard bitch had no response to my answer to its last random question.

If it has a point to make, let it make that point. I’ve no interest in playing its bizarre and irrelevant games.

And we notice there isn’t an answer.

Why is that?

See above.

Out of a 98-page report all you can come up with is a few sentences to object to?

The lizard bitch has yet to explain why it chose to pimp a plagiarized ‘report’.

By: Cao

Cao — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:02 +0000

Out of a 98-page report all you can come up with is a few sentences to object to? And some sweeping Lyzenko style generalizations about how the “science is settled”? bwahahaha!

Yeah that all makes sense in loony lefty world.

By: Cao

Cao — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:54:49 +0000

LOL you mean like the idiot who brought up homosexuality and the nazis on this subject on my blog?

Actually I have a very real purpose for continuing to ask that question.

And we notice there isn’t an answer.

Why is that?

By: meatbrain

meatbrain — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:18:49 +0000

So are you or are you not Terry Bisson?

Because if you aren’t, the title of your blog is plagiarism.

Should I contact his publisher to find out if they’re going to sue?

Absolutely. That is exactly what lizard bitch Cao should do, if it truly believes that I am committing either plagiarism or copyright infringement.

I will await with interest Cao’s report of its communications with Mr. Bisson’s publisher.

WHO IS THE JOHN BROWN ANTI-KLAN COMMITEE???

I am trying to figure out why I should answer the liazrd bitch’s question. After all, it did nothing whatsoever with the answer to the last irrelevant question it asked me.

Could this be some bizarre form of Tourette’s syndrome, forcing Cao to blurt out random questions having nothing whatever to do with the subject at hand?

By: Adam

Adam — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:19:09 +0000

I’m with Green Eagle. Cao’s refutation? It’s ok to cite bogus information from an unqualified source that was stealing from other unqualified sources, because other people somewhere are plagiarists. Right. Cao sure is handy with that shovel she uses to dig herself deeper into the bullshit.

By: Green Eagle

Green Eagle — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:14:18 +0000

She didn’t like the picture of meat in your header.

That’s what I like about your site- such meaningful discussion of the issues from your opponents.

By: Cao

Cao — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:59:06 +0000

By the way, the meat you have in the header is too bloody to be brain tissue.

But that’s because you don’t have a brain…

http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w200/kterry2/Normal_Fresh_Brain-Gross4-Arrows.jpg

That’s what brain tissue looks like.

But who cares about accuracy, you make things up as you go along.

By: Cao

Cao — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:56:58 +0000

McGartland told Carlin to drop the subject-”With the endangerment finding nearly final, you need to move on to other issues and subjects. I don’t want you to spend any additional EPA time on climate change. No papers, no research, etc, at least until we see what EPA is going to do with Climate.”

But that’s not suppression, oh, no.

“The time for such discussion of fundamental issues has passed for this round. The administrator and the administration has decided to move forward on endangerment, and your comments do not help the legal or policy case for this decision. ... I can only see one impact of your comments given where we are in the process, and that would be a very negative impact on our office.”

A predetemined storyline that they’d already decided – and “transparency”, just like Obama’s transparency – is nonexistent.

They’d already decided to go ahead with the “endangerment” language, and everyone needs to be a toadie to the gubimint so they can ram that ole’ cap and trade up our keesters!

You’re a loon and so are all the lefties you quote, rotting meat!

And again –

WHO IS THE JOHN BROWN ANTI-KLAN COMMITEE???

Please share that with me

And please share with me why the name of your blog is not plagiarizing someone’s work.

Unless, of course, you are the author of that work.?

By: Cao

Cao — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:43:59 +0000

Let’s see…Obama’s speeches leaned heavily on plagiarism…

http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/20/the-obama-plagiarism-scandal/

Joe Biden is a plagiarist…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIaALKHVrAA

But of course it only matters if it’s on the conservative side of the aisle.

You really should get a new schtick, you stupid loon.

Discrediting the points with cries of plagiarism is not going to work with people who know how to think…

But then again…that leaves out most of the self-loathing white guys who promote minorities because they have so much white guilt…

such as yourself.

Feelings, woah woah woah feelings…

bwahahahahaha