Yes, Derek Foley is a lying coward

Derek Foley is a college freshman majoring in microbiology at Ohio State. It seem that he has just about as much intellectual courage and moral sense as the microbes he studies.

In a recent blog post, he leapt to the defense of the torture techniques used by the Bush administration to elicit the “facts” that they wanted to hear. I undertook to debunk his flimsy arguments. Derek has decided that facts are inconvenient things, and that it is much much too dangerous to allow his readers to see said facts. He has deleted the comments I left at his blog because he fears the facts I presented. Of course, I have preserved a mirror of the comment thread as it was before Derek Foley decided that the facts made him nervous.

It’s a common reaction among the gutless wingnuts, especially the larval variety. Derek Foley has discovered that the harsh light of reality doesn’t agree with the fantasy world he has built for himself, so he scuttles under the refrigerator like all his kind.

Alas, the poor little insect hasn’t seen the last of me. I will continue to plague Derek Foley with the truth about the world, and the truth about himself — simply because liars of the Derek Foley variety so richly deserve the pain that the facts bring with them.

UPDATE 06/11/09 5:33 PM EDT: Lying idiot-child Derek Foley has replied to the post above via email — he lacks the balls to reply publicly. Herewith is the original email, and a translation of the more amusing bits from Derek’s liar-speak…

From: Derek Foley <foley.193@osu.edu>
To: “meatbrain@thinkingmeat.net” <meatbrain@thinkingmeat.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 17:07:36 -0400
Subject: Re: Yes, Derek Foley is a lying coward


Dear Terry,

Hey, I gave you a fair warning and you chose to ignore it and test me. Did you think I wouldn’t delete your comments?

Translation: I always delete comments that prove me to be a lying asshole. How else can I maintain the facade of being a truthtelling genius?

Honestly, you waste my time along with my readers’ time.

Translation: You keep asking for these inconvenient things you call facts. I have bushels and bushels of lies to spread around! I don’t have time to go looking for the facts!

You ignore points made, don’t read the blog posts, and just spew profanity like no other.

Translation: And as you know, I have never allowed profanity on my blog, ever ever ever.

You are rude, self-involved, and ignorant. In the e-world, you are labeled as a troll. Fortunately for everyone, you gave me the go ahead to delete your comments.

Translation: Damn, I sure am glad I was able to manufacture an excuse to gut the comments section. All those facts you kept putting in there were getting to be embarrassing.

Note how I was able to dismantle each and every one of your so called “arguments”.

Translation: Note how handily I ignored the facts and moved the goalposts. Try it! It’s fun!

You presented “facts” that were either irrelevant (like how you said the Bush administration foiled the LA attacks in 2002. That was the 1st wave that was foiled. There were multiple plans, regardless of whether you choose to believe so or not),

Translation: Isn’t it great how easy it is to ignore a fact when you call it a “fact”? And it’s really, really handy to be able to reach up into my rectum and yank out a convenient fantasy like an imaginary second planned attack on Los Angeles. Phew, I sure am glad I had that shit ready to go…

…or were invalid (that the US form of waterboarding leaves lasting injury, can cause death, and causes severe pain). You failed to show that my points were invalid in any sense of the word. You repeatedly ignored my logic, instead jumping to say “nuh uh”, presenting the previously mentioned “facts”.

Translation: I’m so glad I never really defined this imaginary “US form of waterboarding”. It’s incredibly useful to be able to invent all kinds of silly-ass things that it does and does not do. Can’t do that if I allow myself to be tied down to the facts, now can I?

I meet people everyday who disagree with me. There is a big difference between those people and you. They are civil. They have arguments and reasoning that address my own arguments and reasoning.

Translation: They’re stupid enough to ignore the fact that I am a barefaced liar with less moral sense than one finds in the common housefly.

They concentrate on the discussion. You, however, spew inane comments, choose to ignore my arguments and facts, are rude, disregard logic, and ultimately, just end up wasting my time along with a good deal of space on my blog.

Translation: Your facts were taking up valuable space that I need to post more lies! Out, damned fact!

I can understand how this would be upsetting for you. What will you do with your time? Here are some suggestions. Go write another sci fi book. Read “Meltdown” by Tom Woods. Read the Constitution. Make some new friends.

Translation: Go away and stop exposing me for the dishonest shitwad that I am.

Honestly Terry, you aren’t worth my time. Discussions with you go no where.

Translation: When I tell a lie, you call me on it immediately. It’s not fair! MOM-MEEEEEE!!!!

I learn nothing from them and neither do you.

Translation: I don’t want to know the facts. I want to remain the pig-ignorant lying asswipe that I am. It’s so much easier than dealing with reality.

It is like preaching to the deaf=3B you know no reason and are unwavering in your ignorance.

Translation: Wow, I haven’t smeared deaf people for at least three or four days. Glad I was able to get that gratuitous insult in there.

Nice talking to you, kind of,

Derek Foley

p.s. Good to see you used the “find people” feature on OSU’s page. I am a Geological Sciences and Political Science major now. I switched last quarter. I saw too many ignorant numb-skulls and decided I had to do something.

Translation: I realized that even microbes were too complex for me to grasp. Rocks. I like rocks. Rocks my friends.


The simple fact is that Derek Foley is a proven liar and an utter coward. He can’t conduct an honest discussion, so he deletes comments that cite inconvenient facts and lies some more.

And on the subject of torture, the question must be asked: Why do Derek Foley and his fellow torture fetishists want to hand al Qaeda a valuable recruitment tool?

(hat tip: News Hounds)

UPDATE 06/19/09 7:58 PM EDT: The drooling moron has sent another email:

From: Derek Foley <foley.193@osu.edu>
To: “meatbrain@thinkingmeat.net” <meatbrain@thinkingmeat.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:47:42 -0400
Subject: Re: Yes, Derek Foley is a lying coward


Well Terry, if you had some balls you would post a big fat link on your site so your “readers” can take a look for themselves. If they really want to know if I am a liar, send them to my site. Again, you are a waste of time. I leave you with a single link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch=3Fv=3DoHg5SJYRHA0

Sincerely,

The lying scumbag, D.J. D-wrek

Of course, had the idiot child bothered to actually read this post, he would know that there is indeed a link to his post in the first paragraph. Anyone reading his post will arrive at the inescapable conclusion that Derek Foley is, in fact, a liar.

The link the little shitwad sent has nothing whatsoever do to with the discussion, either. He’s too fucking stupid to stick to the subject.

UPDATE 06/20/09 2:20 PM EDT: And more babbling from the lying crapbaby:

From: Derek Foley <foley.193@osu.edu>
To: “meatbrain@thinkingmeat.net” <meatbrain@thinkingmeat.net>
Date: Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: Yes, Derek Foley is a lying coward


RICKROLLEDDDDDD!

But seriously, don’t make it obscure. A BIG FAT LINK. Want to see Derek’s site for yourself? HERE YOU GO: WWW.MYUNCOMMONSENSE.COM. It is funny because no one really comes on my site saying I am a liar except for you. Interesting!

A news flash: A lying son of a bitch like Derek Foley doesn’t get to dictate how other people link to his site.

And how, exactly, would we know if anyone else had pointed out Foley’s lies in comments to his posts? He deletes any comments that dare to point out his dishonesty.

UPDATE 06/21/09 7:47 AM EDT: Here we go again:

From: Derek Foley <foley.193@osu.edu>
To: “meatbrain@thinkingmeat.net” <meatbrain@thinkingmeat.net>
Date: Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:10 AM
Subject: Re: Yes, Derek Foley is a lying coward


Uh, no. I delete comments that have vulgar language, i.e. the language you use in your emails.

“Shit” “Fuck” “Ass” “Bitch” and “damn” or “hell” if used in a malicious way. Racial slurs also are not allowed. This has been made clear, and it baffles me that you still do not comprehend why your comments were thrown in the spam bin. I am perfectly content with a civil debate. However, I will not have derogatory language on my blog. Note how it has my name on it, not an alias.

Note how the idiot Derek Foley is lying again. Take, for instance, this comment — Derek deleted it not because it contained any “derogatory language”, but because it included facts that he found terribly inconvenient.

The same is true of this comment. And this comment.

Oh, and as for not allowing “derogatory language” on his blog… if that is so, then why does Derek use one of the very words he defines as “derogatory” in his own comments?

Keep your head on your shoulders and out of your ass.

…my ass is probably fairly safe in Columbus Ohio either way…

(Don’t bother editing or deleted those comments, little maggot. I’ve already got mirrors saved.)

So, what have we learned, boys and girls? We’ve learned that Derek Foley deletes comments not because of his feigned horror at “derogatory language”, but because he is too intellectually stunted to deal with the facts presented. And we’ve learned that after he deletes those inconveniently fact-laden comments, he will happily (and clumsily) lie about why he did so.

So far I have put meathead’s comments in the spam folder, and I have deleted one other because it contained the word “shit”. None others.

We already know that this is a lie. Once again, Derek proves that he believes that repeating a lie somehow magically makes it the truth.

For someone who is 67 years old, you have a lot of growing up to do.

Now that is hilarious. Derek Foley hasn’t yet learned that lying is wrong — and he is purporting to teach other people a lesson?

Remember, folks… imbecile wingnuts like Derek Foley really are your best Internet entertainment value!

  1. Dear Mr. Meat,

    I was saddened to hear that you have been banned from Derek Foley’s site. Life is so unfair sometimes.

    Since you can’t go there anymore, I left a little comment in support of you on Derek’s latest “post.” I hope you like it.

    That kid has a lot to learn. Like a sense of shame.

    All the Best,
    Green Eagle

  2. What k ind of person thinks that you can actually ban somebody from a web site? Seriously. Are these people intertubez stupid too?

  3. Dear Terry Bisson,

    Sorry that it hit so close to home that I followed through on my promise. I am perfectly okay with damn and hell, so long as they are not directed at an individual. I have never allowed “shit” to be on my site. Not once. I recall a supporter of my site actually used the word so I deleted the comment. I doubt he noticed.

    Like I said Terence, I gave you fair warning, so now your comments reside in the spam file. You are a troll, nothing more. You never addressed the debate at hand, and constantly resorted to your go to response “because derek says so!”, even though I provided an ample number of sources.

    Should anyone want to check out my site, it is http://www.myuncommonsense.com. Don’t take Terry’s word for it, he is a science fiction writer, not an honest straight edge American.

    In response to: “I realized that even microbes were too complex for me to grasp. Rocks. I like rocks. Rocks my friends.”

    I didn’t like biochem too much. Parasites were dandy, but most other things were boring. I prefer water systems or planetary geology, but yes, I do like rocks. Seeing as how you have a head full of them I’m sure you can understand.

  4. You never addressed the debate at hand…

    Derek Foley is lying, of course. He deleted my comments precisely because I did address the debate at hand. I provided facts that the little asswipe could not counter. Anyone reading the original thread can see that for themselves.

  5. “Jun 4, 2009, 16:46”

    Go to that comment, scroll about 2/3 of the way down. That was after the warning.