Another lying wingnut coward

January 1, 2009 in Political Animals | 14 comments

Gee, what a surprise. The cretin that calls itself Robert, over at American and Proud, is not only an advocate of murder, but a coward and liar as well.

Yesterday he vomited up his list of “the 5 WORST people in the blogsphere”, in which he made the following accusation:

#3 Thinking Meat (Or thinking of meat)

This is another libtard troll, he has frequented here and several other “Right minded” blogs, he really never says anything other than the daily KO’s talking points. Rumor has it he is under house arrest for child molesting, I am not sure how true that rumor is, but I wouldn’t doubt it. TM is by far one of the most prolific trolls the blogworld has seen, he posts comments and blogs about us “Conservatives” He insults us the best he can by showing how big of a traitor he is. He has posted lies upon lies but calls it “education” I love the faux intelectual type, as you will see soon enough. Congratulations TM you have made the list..

Laughable, yes? So I challenged him to back up his bullshit, and posted the following comment (mirrored here):

Yo, dickwad…

You got the stones to list the specific lies you’re accusing me of, and cite the evidence that what I said was actually false?

Or are you one of the usual run of peckerwood fucknuts who are great at making vague accusations, but scuttle back under the rocks when you are challenged to back up your spew?

That’s kinda what I thought…

Not only does Robert lack the balls to make specific accusations, he lacks even the minimal guts needed to accept that he’s been challenged to do so. He has posted a forgery in place of my comment.

That’s the norm among wingnuts. They are cowards of the most blatant kind. I thank Robert for illustrating that fact so clearly.

  1. kemibe on January 1, 2009 at 5:11 pm

    If there’s one trait that almost all extreme nutter-bloggers exhibit (I’m leaving out an inability to write in their native language and the compulsion to ban and edit comments for the same reason I don’t usually need to point out that women are born with ovaries), it is the staunch refusal to think to their targets.

    This is a result, I am sure, of projection: Absent meaningful lives outside of their cybertoilets, they have self-esteem that lives and dies by their hit counts and assume everyone else does as well. Gribbit is like this, ever telling his handful of daily visitors that he’s not going to point them toward “Kevin the Chimp.” I guess this is one of many surrogates for responding to direct demands for evidence of what they say, which of course is something they can never provide.

    Anyway, I submitted this comment to Robert’s post (it’s currently awaiting moderation):

    “I must say 2008 has been less than stellar, our leadership ( BOTH sides ) have caused emence harm to our nation.”

    I got an emence laugh out of this.

    Thank for making it clear after less than one sentence that I didn’t need to continue reading to know that what followed was going to be a typically incoherent and rage-fueled diatribe about your intellectual betters.

    By the way, “leadership” is a single noun and therefore takes a single verb, so I suggest replacing “have” with “has,” not that this will improve the overall flavor of this repository of backward ideas.

    If you want 2009 to be a better year for you, try enrolling in a remedial English course.

  2. kemibe on January 1, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    He’s already edited the comment, banned my IP, and even set up a redirect to a gay porn site. Rarely do you see even a high-caliber wingnut this intent on tying liberalism to homosexuality.

    Hilariously, he still doesn’t realize that “emence” is not even close to the word he was looking for.

    Here’s my soon-to-be-edited follow-up comment:——-
    As I thought, you are not only illiterate and a coward, but are obsessed with homosexuality as well. I wonder what that might mean?

    Understand that editing comments is something done solely out of an inability to defend one’s viewpoints and is a categorical hallmark of low intelligence and poor character. Therefore, I encourage you to keep doing it, as this merely reinforces everything learned people say about ring-wingnuts.

    It has to suck living in a head like yours.

  3. kemibe on January 1, 2009 at 6:54 pm

    The above comment never got through, and in its place is this one from Robert:

    Chimpanzee Refuge Writes:

    No Robert, I can not meet you for a beer, I know for a fact that you would kick my ass. Yes you are a real man and I am just a low life faggot hanging on Meatbrains every word. I really hope you can forgive me, I will never come back here again… Well except to tell you how much I admire your courage and ability to tell the truth.

    Thanks again for not coming to my house and beating the faggot out of me.

    Now Chimpfaggot don’t be so hard on yourself.. No hard feelings here…
    ——
    Amusingly, his “refuse to link” policy seems to extend only to his posts, as he left the link to the Chimp Refuge in my first comment even after altering it.

    I never thought I’d say this, but you’ve pointed me toward someone whose views are actually to the right of Gribbit’s.

  4. meatbrain on January 1, 2009 at 8:56 pm

    Robert is a coward, pure and simple — a moral and intellectual coward. The most stupid and rabid of wingnuts usually are.

  5. Rev. BigDumbChimp on January 2, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    I mean, I think these types aren’t even worth it sometimes. He’s beyond any semblance of trying to argue a point. He’s mired in 5th grade schoolyard bully tactics.

    But then I remember the entertainment value.

  6. meatbrain on January 2, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    He’s mired in 5th grade schoolyard bully tactics.

    Interesting that you should bring that up, Rev. I saw this from the BBC earlier today:

    Every generation of schoolchildren has them, the playground put-downs that can leave a pupil’s reputation in tatters among their peers.

    For the current generation, “gay”, “bitch” and “slag” are the most frequently used terms of abuse, according to a survey by the Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL).

    They are used by children of all ages, from nursery school upwards. But the worst offenders are secondary school pupils, says the teaching union.

    WHAT TEACHERS HEAR

    • Gay (83%)
    • Bitch (59%)
    • Slag (45%)
    • Poof (29%)
    • Batty boy (29%)
    • Slut (26%)
    • Queer (26%)
    • Lezzie (24.8%)• Homo (22%)
    • Faggot (11%)
    • Sissy (5%)

    Compare that list to Robert’s limited vocabulary, and it’s pretty clear how childish his mindset really is.

  7. Scott Malensek on January 2, 2009 at 7:07 pm

    “Yo, dickwad…You got the stones to list the specific lies you’re accusing me of, and cite the evidence that what I said was actually false?”

    TOO FUNNY! Every time you post ANYTHING that I say, you make massive misquotes, even add insults to make it fit your braincell’s capacity, and then you’ve got enough of an ego to whine like a little girl when someone calls you out? Drop a nut, grow up, and see if you can make some serious political discussion without making things up, and then complaining about the sizzle and steak of what you make up.

    I’ll be holding a pitty party for you in the meantime.

  8. meatbrain on January 2, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    When and where have I misquoted you, Malensek? Specifics, please.

  9. Scott Malensek on January 2, 2009 at 7:14 pm

    “I’m not an advocate of randomly launching rockets into populated Palestinian areas. But I am delighted to see bombs being lobbed into populated Palestinian areas.”

    I do not DELIGHT in anyone’s suffering, and my quote had nothing like that in it. You wanna play a “Shorter Meatbrain” game?

  10. meatbrain on January 2, 2009 at 7:15 pm

    I asked you where I misquoted you, Malensek. If you don’t understand that the “shorter” form of your vomitus isn’t a quote and isn’t represented as one, that’s your problem.

    Now, again: When and where have I misquoted you, Malensek? Specifics, please.

  11. kemibe on January 2, 2009 at 9:33 pm

    Hey, I have a shocker for you. The commenter “Texas Fred” on Robert’s blog is none other than Robert himself. This is obvious at a glance, as Robert is too stupid to successfully adopt more than one persona, but now there’s evidence.

  12. Jenn of the jungle on January 3, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    LOL…..this is a serious cesspool of Libtard rage. Good times. Thanks for making me laugh…. at you, always at you, never with you.

    Oh and Robert and Fred are two different people, stop being such paranoid schizo conspiracy theorists.

  13. meatbrain on January 3, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    Oh and Robert and Fred are two different people, stop being such paranoid schizo conspiracy theorists.

    The evidence suggests otherwise. It appears that “TexasFred” is simply a sock puppet for “Robert”. In each persona, he is a coward who cannot conduct a rational conversation, and in fact is so pants-pissing insecure that he cannot abide disagreement with his views.

  14. kemibe on January 4, 2009 at 1:26 am

    How about that: another anonymous, angry, racist moron with a blog full of garbage and no command of either English or facts, lying on behalf of a cohort—in this case the alarmingly schiztarded Robert/Fred.

    Not only do “they” share an IP address, “they” registered their respective domains on the very same day. What a coincidence!

    People like you and “them” should be grateful that anyone mentions you at all, even if it’s in a negative light, for as you know, your choices in terms of your piddly online presence are to be hated or ignored, and you’re sufficiently free of morals, attention, and real-life worth to actually prefer, even crave, the former.

    There but for the grace of FSM and all of that.