Didn’t bother with those links now, did you?

No, I didn’t. If Burhans cannot make his own arguments, I am not the least bit interested in who he chooses to argue for him.

Thus far in this thread, Burhans hasn’t cited anything specific that Obama has said that Burhans disagrees with. Vague whinings about Obama’s “voting record” or “campaign statements” are not an argument.

When the data is provided, you ask for MORE data.

Burhans has yet to supply any data about Obama’s position in this thread. I have no intention of sifting through links trying to figure out specifically what Burhans doesn’t like. If he does not know how to quote someone, he can always find a bright fourteen-year-old to teach him.

I’m guessing that the specific references to his campaign’s well-known quotes about supporting the ‘individual right’, the specific reference to his voting fo the handgun purchase restriction measure, the ‘F’ Rating, and the Brady Bunch reference just aren’t specific ENOUGH!

Burhans made no specific references. He merely made assertions for which he expects someone else to look up the supporting information. That seems to be all he knows how to do.

Didn’t bother with those links now, did you? I’ll add to my previous assertion that you learn how to use a search engine and learn something about your candidate: Learn how to click on a link. Then, learn how to read.

Do you see why people mostly ignore you, Meatbrain? You don’t provide anything more interesting than a constant sense of outrage. When someone honestly attempts to engage you in a discussion, you scream “liar! liar!”, or demand endless amounts of data. When the data is provided, you ask for MORE data. Then when THAT’S provided, you fall back on deliberate misinterpretation, mis-reads, or brick-wall ignorance.

Are you even REMOTELY capable of a discussion? It surely doesn’t seem that way.

I’ve provided you with MORE than enough specifics, links, and information for a response. I’ve suggested half a dozen topics and asked you to pick one. Then, at your request, I picked one. Then I started the discussion, then at your request, I CONTINUED the discussion. Discussion requires at least TWO participants, meaty. (Reminds me of THIS post)

Ball’s in your court.

Orion

PS: I can only imagine a discussion with you on some scientific topic – You’d require a complete recitation of the reasoning behind the Euclidean postulates followed by a unique derivation of the fundamental laws of geometry and mathematics, an original restatement of ‘Principia Mathematica’ and then claim you were only asking for specifics.

PPS: snorts “Specifics” I’m guessing that the specific references to his campaign’s well-known quotes about supporting the ‘individual right’, the specific reference to his voting fo the handgun purchase restriction measure, the ‘F’ Rating, and the Brady Bunch reference just aren’t specific ENOUGH!

Do you want a complete recitation of his voting record on 2nd Amendment issues?

I want Burhans to explicitly describe the positions he claims to oppose. I am not interested in discussing anything with someone who cannot or will not demonstrate that he knows what he is arguing against.

Learn how to use a freakin’ search engine Meatbrain, or learn something about your candidate.

It is a notable characteristic of wingnuts that they expect their opponents to find the facts that the wingnuts cannot or will not look up for themselves. It is Burhans’ job to explain specifically what he finds objectionable about Obama’s positions — not mine.

His current campaign statements on his ‘support’ for the ‘individual right’ aspect of the 2nd Amendment are NOT supported by his VERY lengthy history of voting for every gun-control measure to cross his desk or his statements calling for a renewal of the Assault Weapons Ban…

Which statements? What history? There is no reason to take Burhans’ assertions here at face value.

Specifics, please.

For one who is always screaming about how your opponents never debate anything, you never seem to debate anything – All I’ve really seen you do is scream ‘Liar! Liar!’, complain about people posting links to other sites, insult, et. al.

His current campaign statements on his ‘support’ for the ‘individual right’ aspect of the 2nd Amendment are NOT supported by his VERY lengthy history of voting for every gun-control measure to cross his desk or his statements calling for a renewal of the Assault Weapons Ban, nor his F rating from the NRA, nor by how ‘happy’ the Brady Bunch is with his positions. For example, his voting for a measure to limit handgun purchases to one a month, or his support for the DC gun ban.

Here’s are some links for you to get you started.
Novak at the Washington Post
More info.

Orion

Well let’s start with an easy one – Obama’s opposition to the 2nd Amendment…

Specifics, please. What is it exactly that you claim Obama opposes?

Dan, what would you like to know?
Here are some links that I found interesting although I’ve not dug into them to any depth:
Powerline on Iraq/Rezko
Pajamas Media on the same.
Chicago Tribune on Obama’s trust of Rezko.

Seems somewhat damning to me. Not quite on a par with McCain’s ‘Keating 5’ membership though.

Orion

Dealer’s choice…

Orion

I think you’ll find racist morons EVERYWHERE. Chicago, LA, Ottumwa IA, France, Hungary, Japan (Gaijin, anyone?) – everywhere. Democrats, Republicans, Greens, Muslim, Aryan Nation, KKK – it’s as common as e. Coli and breeds as quickly.

It’s not hard to find. As a funny bit of irony, I found more racism in the Arizona Green Party than I have in the US Army. The usual comment there is “We’re all GREEN.”

Orion

Not political. But interesting that in the right wing bastion of Lakeview – a particularly diverse neighborhood, sports mentality allows for blatant racism.

Recently, the Texas Republican Party held an event which included vendors. One of those vendors was selling a button that read “If Obama is President, will we still call it the White House?” The reaction from the left was immediate and of…

Would you care to discuss his anti-2nd Amendment policies, his taxation policies, his energy policies, his foreign policies, or some of his domestic policies? The vast majority of which I disagree with?

Orion

I’m unimpressed and still in opposition to his policies and positions…

And yet Jeff “Orion” Burhans chooses not to discuss Obama’s policies and positions, opting once again to employ the hoary and bankrupt smear of guilt by association. Typical.

Oh wait…you don’t think. Sorry. Silly question.

Or do you feel that the buttons were somehow sanctioned by the Republican National Committee? Oh…Hmm…Hey, which party was it that tried to block the 1964 Civil Rights Act, anyway? Just curious.

Orion

(Randy, still sorting through the morass on those links. Same information as I’ve encountered anywhere else though so far, which is no surprise considering what they are. I’m unimpressed and still in opposition to his policies and positions, but I’ll finish the reading anyway.)