Right meathead?

I see big dog giving you what you asked for, links and proof…

False. Dogmeat was challenged to cite specific errors in the Media Matters article. He has failed to do so.

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh

LALALALALALALALALALALALALALA

Imagine a 6 year old child sitting on the floor crying and covering his ears all while loudly saying .. LA LA LA LA LA LA

Once you have that picture, you will know what Meathead looks and acts like

Prove they are right.

Note that Dogmeat originally claimed that “MM is in error”. He seems eager to abandon that position, now that he has been challenged to back it up with facts.

You are not civil.

This is an interesting accusation, coming as it does from one who accuses me of being “delusional” and on “too many drugs”.

[sarc]
You are so right Meatbrain. I can’t prove anything. I am worthless when compared to your superior intellect. I should have never come here to point out that the war was the fault of all the politicians when it is obvious that George Bush is so intelligent and superior to all of us that he could carry this out on his own. Despite you and others questioning his intelligence, Bush has proven far superior and you have admitted as such by letting everyone know he was so smart he fooled all the so called brilliant people in Congress and on the left.

I am sorry for doubting your wisdom and will not bother trying to have a civil conversation again.
[/sarc]

It would be pointless. You are not civil.

Good bye Terry. Go write another brilliant piece about Meat that thinks….

It is not that I am unable to do anything.

False. Dogmeat is unable to produce evidence for his claim regarding “what the dems said before [Bush] was president”. For some unknown reason, he insists on posting multiple reminders of his failure.

It is not an ad hominem attack…

Dogmeat is lying. He is unable to produce evidence for his claim regarding “what the dems said before [Bush] was president”. He therefore falls back on that hoary old standby of the wingnut, the ad hominem attack.

MM is in error.

Dogmeat has yet to cite a single error in the Media Matters article, much less provide evidence of same.

Prove they are not.

Dogmeat’s intellectual dishonesty is boundless. He actually seems to believe that when he makes a claim, he bears no responsibility to support it with facts; that it instantly becomes someone else’s responsibility to disprove it.

It is not that I am unable to do anything. I have decided not to play games with a 66 year old bitter man. It is not an ad hominem attack, it is the truth, you are delusional.

MM is in error. Prove they are not. I asked you to prove it earlier but you were unable to so you resorted to attacking me.

They show MM is in error.

False. None of the articles Dogmeat referenced provides any evidence of errors in the Media Matters article.

It is not worth the time for me to produce anything.

Dogmeat is unable to produce evidence for his claim regarding “what the dems said before [Bush] was president”. For some unknown reason, he insists on posting multiple reminders of his failure.

You are delusional. That is what happens when you take too many drugs.

Dogmeat is unable to produce evidence for his claim regarding “what the dems said before [Bush] was president”. He therefore falls back on that hoary old standby of the wingnut, the ad hominem attack.

In other words, is it waiting for you to decide or did you trash it?

MM cites assessments and my articles are interviews with people there. They show MM is in error.

I am glad you did not delete my comments where I wrote how you would respond. It is not worth the time for me to produce anything. If we had video of the transfer or if we had a recording of the yellow cake conversation you would fund some way to call people names and say it is a lie.

We have played this game too many times. You always insult people and their assertions, claim their stuff is not good enough and generally act like an ass. I am not going to keep playing the game so you can run your visitor total up.

You are delusional. That is what happens when you take too many drugs. How stoned did you get at the University of Louisville? You were there in the 60s so you must have found good drugs. It explains quite a bit.

I had a comment that said awaiting moderation and now it is not here. Are you deleting them?

Perhaps Dogmeat can find a bright twelve-year-old to explain the concept of comment moderation to him.

Cite specific truths in the MM article. You can’t because there is no proof other than this one said or that one said.

False. In each case, Media Matters cites assessments from specific intelligence agencies that fail to support the distortions employed by Bush et al.

Note that Dogmeat is still unable to cite specific errors in the Media Matters article.

As for the rest, I am not wasting my time.

Dogmeat is unable to support his claims. Once again, he runs away from his own assertions. Such intellectual cowardice is, of course, quite common amongst the wingnuts.

Prove it and show that the Dems and him were not saying the same things.

Dogmeat’s intellectual dishonesty is boundless. He actually seems to believe that when he makes a claim, he bears no responsibility to support it with facts; that it instantly becomes someone else’s responsibility to disprove it.