Wheeee! When an ignorant liar like Ogre decides to make a fool of himself, he goes whole hog!
From a recent post:
And the Democrat Party motto:
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” — H. L. Mencken
Three words, imbecile: WMDs in Iraq. That particular hobgoblin was constructed and deployed by a Republican administration — and over 4000 Americans, as well as countless Iraqis, have died as a result.
Stay stupid, jackwad.
-
It’s funny the Ogre doesn’t see the irony of his quote. The wingnut blogosphere is full of vaguely menacing posts about how ‘Islamo-fascists’ – who have neither armies, navies or air forces capable of ‘taking over’ America – are just about to subjugate America, the most heavily armed country on the planet.
-
It was constructed AND deployed by the Republicans? I think it was constructed before Bush ever took office and it was constructed by prominent Democrats.
It was indeed deployed by the Republicans.
Maybe I am wrong but I am sure that the Dems were saber rattling on this when Bubba was prez.
Is this incorrect?
-
Please explain Dearborn Michigan…..they didn’t need an army, navy or air force to take over there….. -
I am pretty certain that many of those quotes were from before he was in office. It means that the Democrats who said them had those thoughts, ideas, opinons or feeling before Bush did AND BEFORE 9/11.
Bush might have sold it (concocted, amazingly the Dems cite intelligence that they have seen. They tell us there is no doubt) but the Dems were the ones who came up with it. You said that the Republicans constructed it when it is obvious that the dems were building it before Bush took office.
It is fair to say that it was the work of both parties.
-
Everything he said was what the dems said before he was president which means that they must have lied too.
I don’t call it lying when you use the intelligence to make an assessment and you are wrong. I did not call Clinton a liar for bombing an aspirin factory based on faulty intelligence.
Given that every major intelligence agency said the same thing there must be an awful lot of liars out there, based on your position.
They were all complicit in starting it (except those who voted no). They should have voted no if they did not think it was true.
-
And Media Matters is a left wing source. You always say to use an independent and varifiable source so try doing that.
-
I am not going to do it for you. It would be pointless. The conversation would go like this:
[Sources cited]
Meatbrain:
Liar, prove it, liar, that is not credible. Once again I say to cite specific errors. And your response to this will be Big Dog says that something is so but does not prove it, liar.As for the quotes, any thinking person (that is your name?) can see the similarities in the statements and will agree that this was caused by all parties concerned.
Except of course…
-
This could be a lie
Or this
Or
thisOr
thisOr
thisThese point to differences between what MM said and what others have said. One of the sides has to be in error. That last one is pretty damning. It comes from fact check and says that the Yellow Cake statement (the 16 words) were well founded.
And then there is this pointing out that Hussein’s men did indeed meet with Nigerian officials.
So at least part of what MM wrote is in dispute.
-
Dogmeat refuses to back up his claim because he knows that it is a baseless invention for which no evidence can be found.
Just as I predicted.
Your links are posted and my claim is backed up.
-
Cite specific truths in the MM article. You can’t because there is no proof other than this one said or that one said.
My sources show that the yellow cake issue is in error as is the claim about chemical weapons. Though MM just rehashes conversations and never makes the claim that the words were false, only that others said they might be wrong. The Bitish report shows they were well founded.
The Iraqi officers cited state that Hussein had chemical weapons and that they were moved to Syria. They were there and MM was not. MM relies on the same intelligence that the left said is faulty. I tend to believe the guys who were there.
As for the rest, I am not wasting my time. An earlier poster was correct. You must be one miserable person.
I know, Big Dog was asked to show something and he did not. I have an idea, you claim it was all Bush. Prove it and show that the Dems and him were not saying the same things. Prove it.
-
I had a comment that said awaiting moderation and now it is not here. Are you deleting them?
-
The words went away but the comment did not appear. Did you delete it or not. If you moderated it and decided not to publish then have the testicular fortitude to say so.
In other words, is it waiting for you to decide or did you trash it?
MM cites assessments and my articles are interviews with people there. They show MM is in error.
I am glad you did not delete my comments where I wrote how you would respond. It is not worth the time for me to produce anything. If we had video of the transfer or if we had a recording of the yellow cake conversation you would fund some way to call people names and say it is a lie.
We have played this game too many times. You always insult people and their assertions, claim their stuff is not good enough and generally act like an ass. I am not going to keep playing the game so you can run your visitor total up.
You are delusional. That is what happens when you take too many drugs. How stoned did you get at the University of Louisville? You were there in the 60s so you must have found good drugs. It explains quite a bit.
-
You are wrong as usual.
It is not that I am unable to do anything. I have decided not to play games with a 66 year old bitter man. It is not an ad hominem attack, it is the truth, you are delusional.
MM is in error. Prove they are not. I asked you to prove it earlier but you were unable to so you resorted to attacking me.
-
You made the original claim that MM was the supporting evidence . Prove they are right.
[sarc]
You are so right Meatbrain. I can’t prove anything. I am worthless when compared to your superior intellect. I should have never come here to point out that the war was the fault of all the politicians when it is obvious that George Bush is so intelligent and superior to all of us that he could carry this out on his own. Despite you and others questioning his intelligence, Bush has proven far superior and you have admitted as such by letting everyone know he was so smart he fooled all the so called brilliant people in Congress and on the left.I am sorry for doubting your wisdom and will not bother trying to have a civil conversation again.
[/sarc]It would be pointless. You are not civil.
Good bye Terry. Go write another brilliant piece about Meat that thinks….
-
Its useless Big Dog, Meathead will NEVER admit that his position is on shaky ground.
Imagine a 6 year old child sitting on the floor crying and covering his ears all while loudly saying .. LA LA LA LA LA LA
Once you have that picture, you will know what Meathead looks and acts like
-
I see big dog giving you what you asked for, links and proof, but you instead retaliate by picking up your ball and going home.
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh
LALALALALALALALALALALALALALA
-
meaty, you still haven’t explained dearborn….they took over there…they can do it anywhere. -
Dont count on meathead to explain dearborn, you cant explain that which you cover your ears and eyes and scream and cry on the ground.
Right meathead?




30 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/05/07/ogres-amazing-denseness/trackback