Unsurprisingly, Andrew ‘Dipshit’ Richardson is Still a Lying Imbecile

Call me a dipshit again fuckhead I dare you

Happy to oblige, Andykins. You’re a dipshit. Anyone who lies as often and as incompetently as you do, is at a minimum a dipshit.

Where have I lied? The invitation still is open Meaty.. That is if you can drag your pimple face out of your mommy’s basement long enough to call me a liar you POS.

Everything I said is factual. Because I didn’t list a detail which would satisfy you I’m a liar in your estimation. Too bad no one reads your POS site. what is your hit count, maybe 20 a day? You are a turd. A piece of human debris and that is all you and this site will ever be.

If you had any balls, you’d stop using proxies. If you had any balls, you’d stop trolling. If you had any balls, you’d actually write your own opinion instead of feeding off others. If you were a man you’d unlatch yourself from your mommy’s titty and get the hell out of her basement. If you were a man, you’d stop attacking those you didn’t agree with and actually form an opinion. But wait, that would require a brain and you don’t have one do you.

Where have I lied?

I’ve already explained that, dipshit. I’ll type slowly so you can follow it this time.

You stated:

Useless Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon (ROK) is condemning Israeli attacks in the Gaza Strip as excessive use of force. Surprisingly he says nothing about the Palestinian rocket attacks that were killing and maiming civilians indiscriminately.

The Reuters article you cited noted:

“I condemn Palestinian rocket attacks and call for the immediate cessation of such acts of terrorism,” [Ban] said.

You claimed that Ban said nothing about the Palestinian rocket attacks.

Ban did in fact say something about the Palestinian rocket attacks.

You’re a liar, dipshit.

Everything I said is factual.

False. The very article you chose to cite proves that what you said was not factual.

You’re a liar, dipshit.

If you had any balls…

Dipshit, consider that it takes balls to rely on the truth and not your lies to make a point.

Then consider that these balls are precisely what you lack.

Haven’t you gotten it through your puny little head that having you attack one of us is like a badge of honor? You are a little person. Little in mind and in wit.

I have NOT lied. I’m incapable of lying you turd. And no matter how much you in your New York Times worshiping idiocy can turn what I write into fiction.

As I stated above, if you were a real blogger, which you are not, you would actually write, which you don’t. You attack. You represent everything that is wrong with the left. I hope you are proud of that. Because you look like a fool.

And just so you know, you have sent me a grand total of 3 hits. 3. Fatso Eddie does better than that.

I have NOT lied. I’m incapable of lying you turd.

In two sentences you have told two lies. The Reuters article you yourself cited proves that, contrary to your claim, Ban Ki-Moon did in fact denounce the Palestinian attacks on Israel.

And since you did in fact lie, your second claim (“I’m incapable of lying”) is also false.

Because you look like a fool.

I’m not the one who has been caught lying again, dipshit. You are.

But Gribbit you did lie (intentionally or not).

The heading of your post is:

U.N. Sec. Gen. Moon Condemns Israeli Attacks, But What About the Palestinian Attacks?

You then went on to say:

Surprisingly he [Ban Ki-moon] says nothing about the Palestinian rocket attacks that were killing and maiming civilians indiscriminately.

But the article that you link to says:

“I condemn Palestinian rocket attacks and call for the immediate cessation of such acts of terrorism,” he [Ban Ki-moon] said.

So he condemned both the Israeli and Palestinian acts of terrorism. If a person were to just read your post they would incorrectly believe that Ki-moon only condemned the Israeli use of violence when he condemned both.

Unfortunately, you lied (intentionally or not).

Repetition doth not a truth make…it weakens your argument, y’know. Imitating Hitler isn’t the best way to go if you want to increase your cred.

Qwerty,

Wow, you are absolutely correct: “Repetition doth not a truth make.” But then again posting a comment that doesn’t even address the topic at hand isn’t much of a rebuttal. From what I can tell, Gribbit didn’t accurately relay what actually occurred. Just reading the article that Gribbit linked proved that Gribbit’s post was misleading. If you disagree then please post a reason and if it makes sense I’ll retract my post and apologize.

(trying to figure out how tongue-in-cheek your reply was…oh well, I don’t have ESP anyway. Here goes.)

This could be a lesson for all of us (not only Gribbit, but also certain other unnamed bloggers who have been known to take quotes out of context) – a combination of a headline that doesn’t tell the whole story (it only mentions condemning Israel – look at it again) and the juxtaposition of two quotes:
—> “While recognizing Israel’s right to defend itself, I condemn the disproportionate and excessive use of force that has killed and injured so many civilians, including children … I call on Israel to cease such attacks,” said Ban.

“I condemn Palestinian rocket attacks and call for the immediate cessation of such acts of terrorism,” he said.

The end of that last comment got cut off. Oh well.

I just followed the links and lo and behold the 2nd paragraph addresses ban’s call for ‘Islamic militants to stop firing rockets’. From the 2nd paragraph:

“Addressing an emergency session of the Security Council in New York after four days of fighting in which 96 Palestinians have been killed, many of them civilians, Ban also called on Gaza’s Islamist militants to stop firing rockets.”

Goddamn, Gribbit is either a stupid moron or he intentionally lies to his readers. I’m guessing it’s the former. If it’s the latter, I’d be pissed if I was one of his wingnut readers. Who knows though? Wingnuts love getting duped and even when you point out the fact that they have just been duped, they steadfastly stand by the person who just lied to them as long as that person has an American flag visible somewhere and frequently uses the terms ‘socialism’ and ‘Islamofascism’. What a bunch of hapless bunch of navel-gazing suckers.

I wonder if Gribbit will issue a correction?

Those dumbasses never issue corrections. Accountability and personal responsibility (and integrity) are for other people, not them.

They’ll jump on big media for some perceived inaccuracy, especially if it makes Israel – the country they love more than America – look bad.

And yet their blog postings consistently contain outright factual innacuracies & falsehoods from which they’ll then leap to yet more absurd, illogical, illiterate, poorly reasoned and all-around-stoopid conclusions you will read anywhere in your entire day.

It’s a downward spiral of ignorance and stupidity. And they like it.

It’s a downward spiral of ignorance and stupidity. And they like it.

In cases such as Dipshit Richardson, Cao, and their ilk, it is very hard indeed to avoid that conclusion.

That’s really rich coming from an imbecile who doesn’t know what co-sponsoring a bill means.

bwahahahahhahahahahaha!

I see Gribbit has courageously chosen to cut-and-run from the points you raise. It’s pathetic & uttery predictable. They are all incapable of actually debating, even something as mundane as whether or not an article contained reference to a Ban condemnation of Palestinian rocket attacks. If I didn’t know better, I’d say Gribbit was incapable of reading but then that would beg the question ‘how is he capable of writing?’

It’s so easy to dismantle moronic wingnuts who are easily duped and who happily dupe their readers. It’s a gang of liars, unintentional and otherwise. No wonder their crappy party (Republican’t) is on the ropes.

That’s really rich coming from an imbecile who doesn’t know what co-sponsoring a bill means.

Cao is referring to a discussion on its blog, revolving around its lie that Obama’s accomplishments “don’t exist”. Note that I never stated what co-sponsoring a bill meant; instead, I asked Cao if it could name a specific bill that Obama had co-sponsored. Cao fled in terror from this question, because it was afraid of learning something. It must protect its ignorance at all costs.

Note also that Cao is unwilling to address the fact that Dipshit Richardson lied about statements made by UN General Secretary Ban Ki-Moon.

Cao is a cut-and-running, hollyweird worshipping, low-IQ, lazy, delusional, cheeto-munching moron. What has it been, a week since the links to Obama’s legislative accomplishments were posted for her referrence? And she’s still braying about Chris Matthews, the final arbiter of everything that wingnuts must think.

Wingnuts don’t have an original thought in their collective brain. I think they share a braincell amongst themselves and she’s clearly been without it for more than 1 week.

If the War on Terror™ could be won by posting images of Sarah O’Connor from the terminator movies onto your website and prominent display of the American flag, Cao would have killed bin Laden by now. Alas, the world doesn’t quite work that way, which is why America is worse off now than we were 5 years ago. Wingnuts are too dumb to look at the evidence though. They always fall for the razzle dazzle of our Public Relations Cheerleader-in-Chief. I doubt the world has ever seen a dumber collection of people than the ones you’ll find barricaded in the virtual gated community known as the right wing blogosphere.

They’re almost too dumb to live but just smart enough to not die.

Cao’s an “it” too! Too funny! I do love being a blogger of unknown (by others, at least) gender. sigh

Well, Querty, you could just identify your gender if it’s that important to you. That would be easy. There are women in the blogosphere, also.

To be fair to the wingnuts, they (probably) wouldn’t beat up a woman. If we’re lucky.

Mystifying. Very philosophical, O erudite BJ who loves slamming Cao.

There’s this thing called keeping certain aspects of one’s identity online confidential. Personally, I enjoy letting you et al. guess whether I am a male or female. You like slamming people. Personal taste, y’know.

Now that I’m posting in English, do I still get that cute monkey picture?

BTW, it’s spelled Q-W-E-R-T-Y. As in keyboard. I know Querty is more phonetic (and correct if it were an actual English word, rather than an acronym of some sort), and I commend your observation of this critical fact.

My bad. Look! I can acknowledge a mistake unlike our wingnut friends!

QWERTY, stay in the closet, if you want! But please do post in English so we’ll know what you’re saying

(indistinct mumblings of rage at veiled hintings that I am homo/lesbian)

Y’know, I did compliment you first. So there!

Just to let you know, I’m a straight, wingnut (libertarian-leaning), easily-angered, fundie. And I still want the monkey pic. Use Babelfish or ask nicely if you want a translation…

Well, it’s not my blog so I can’t speak for Mr. Meat, but as far as I’m concerned, the more wingnuts, the merrier. I love heaping scorn on them and their ludicrous ‘ideas’. Personally, I’d recommend commenting in English because it seems unnecessary and pointless to post in a language we don’t understand and then have us all go separately (or not go at all) to bablefish for our own translations.

If you can give the cut-and-running wingnut losers a backbone transplant, maybe we’ll get lucky and they’ll stick around to explain why they lie to their readers and why they are so happy about getting duped all the time.

What on earth happened to Gribbit, anyway? His incorrect post is STILL up. QWERTY, are you saying that philisophically speaking, you’re with Gribbit, the lying flimflam man?

Gribbit,

Will you tell us the story about the “work place shooting” that is allegedly the reason why you won’t work for a living. Kender told me all about it, k thx.

Hi Dan,

If you come back to read this, why don’t you share the story of the workplace shooting that keeps Gribbit from working for a living? I’ll assume he wasn’t the shooter though it’s easy to imagine someone as thin-skinned as he is working himself into a homicidal lather.

If he doesn’t work for a living, what on earth does he do? Taste test cheetos? Human guinea pig? Let his wife support him? (Gasp!) Welfare?

From what I’ve gathered over the last year or so, he collects SSI. He had admitted that the court ruled him too crazy to even be allowed to cash his own check (a challenge in most states) and his sister was designated as his payee. I chided that Kender dolt (Gribbit’s E-Friend) who finally met Gribbit at his wedding to Mrs. Gribbit and served as the …..get this….best man.

Strong E-bond there. Kender lives somewhere in buttfuck and Gribble lives in Ohio. They’ve regularly tlaked about what a great moment it was when they first met.

(the picture is fucking hilarious)