<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Dog&#8217;s HIV ignorance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/</link>
	<description>It's meat! And it thinks!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ThinkingMeat &#183; Ho hum&#8230; another day, another lie from Cao</title>
		<link>http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/#comment-17733</link>
		<dc:creator>ThinkingMeat &#183; Ho hum&#8230; another day, another lie from Cao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/#comment-17733</guid>
		<description>[...] Nope. The post in question hasn&#8217;t been deleted. But one doesn&#8217;t expect honesty from Cao. One expects lie after lie after lie after lie&#8230; and Cao does not disappoint.     Some meat thinks. Some doesn&#8217;t. This is what one chunk of meat has on its mind. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nope. The post in question hasn&#8217;t been deleted. But one doesn&#8217;t expect honesty from Cao. One expects lie after lie after lie after lie&#8230; and Cao does not disappoint.     Some meat thinks. Some doesn&#8217;t. This is what one chunk of meat has on its mind. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/#comment-17426</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/#comment-17426</guid>
		<description>That makes sense.  The comments deleted were from just before the problem.

I have no beef with homosexuals
I don't care who you mock.  I mock the Muslims myself
I didn't say anything like the drivel you have for 3
Likewise with number 4

I will likely not be alive when we have the next revolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes sense.  The comments deleted were from just before the problem.</p>
<p>I have no beef with homosexuals<br />
I don&#8217;t care who you mock.  I mock the Muslims myself<br />
I didn&#8217;t say anything like the drivel you have for 3<br />
Likewise with number 4</p>
<p>I will likely not be alive when we have the next revolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan l</title>
		<link>http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/#comment-17412</link>
		<dc:creator>dan l</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/#comment-17412</guid>
		<description>I want BIG DOG to tell me again that I'm not really a conservative because:  

1.  I don't beef with the queer folks.
2.  I mock the shit out Christo-Cons 
3.  I don't say "ZOMG ELECT FRED THOMPSON WE NEED A MOVIE STAR TO BE PREZNIT!!!"
4.  My retorts to criticism of my views do not amount to:  "St000p1d lib-ruhl"


Big Dog, when your "uprising" followed by "civil war" followed by "anarchy" happens, will you be a leader of this event?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want BIG DOG to tell me again that I&#8217;m not really a conservative because:  </p>
<p>1.  I don&#8217;t beef with the queer folks.<br />
2.  I mock the shit out Christo-Cons <br />
3.  I don&#8217;t say &#8220;ZOMG ELECT FRED THOMPSON WE NEED A MOVIE STAR TO BE PREZNIT!!!&#8221;<br />
4.  My retorts to criticism of my views do not amount to:  &#8220;St000p1d lib-ruhl&#8221;</p>
<p>Big Dog, when your &#8220;uprising&#8221; followed by &#8220;civil war&#8221; followed by &#8220;anarchy&#8221; happens, will you be a leader of this event?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meatbrain</title>
		<link>http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/#comment-17409</link>
		<dc:creator>meatbrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/#comment-17409</guid>
		<description>After the database issues yesterday, I had to restore the site from a backup taken Monday morning. I will post a fuller account shortly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the database issues yesterday, I had to restore the site from a backup taken Monday morning. I will post a fuller account shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/#comment-17401</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/#comment-17401</guid>
		<description>Any explanation as to why you deleted all the comments that were on this thread?  You constantly say that those you go after are pulling things down and changing them (your justification for taking screen shots) and now you have deleted a large number of comments from this post.

Folks, if you want to know the entire story go to my website (linked above) and read the entire post and thread of comments, none of which have been deleted.

I think there were over 15 comments in this thread...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any explanation as to why you deleted all the comments that were on this thread?  You constantly say that those you go after are pulling things down and changing them (your justification for taking screen shots) and now you have deleted a large number of comments from this post.</p>
<p>Folks, if you want to know the entire story go to my website (linked above) and read the entire post and thread of comments, none of which have been deleted.</p>
<p>I think there were over 15 comments in this thread&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan l</title>
		<link>http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/#comment-17392</link>
		<dc:creator>dan l</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/#comment-17392</guid>
		<description>Check out his link from 1988 he used to prove that when it comes to aids you only really have to worry about LGBT folks.  

You know, ignorant wingers like him make me embarrassed to be a straight conservative male.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out his link from 1988 he used to prove that when it comes to aids you only really have to worry about LGBT folks.  </p>
<p>You know, ignorant wingers like him make me embarrassed to be a straight conservative male.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meatbrain</title>
		<link>http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/#comment-17388</link>
		<dc:creator>meatbrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/#comment-17388</guid>
		<description>bq. Why don’t you put the rest of it in there so they know the context. 

Simple, imbecile. There is no context that transforms

bq. Heterosexual men do not just get HIV and they do not transmit HIV.

from a false statement to a true one. What you said was false. Your ignorance is seemingly boundless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>Why don’t you put the rest of it in there so they know the context. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Simple, imbecile. There is no context that transforms</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Heterosexual men do not just get HIV and they do not transmit HIV.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>from a false statement to a true one. What you said was false. Your ignorance is seemingly boundless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/#comment-17387</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingmeat.net/2008/01/13/big-dogs-hiv-ignorance/#comment-17387</guid>
		<description>Why don't you put the rest of it in there so they know the context.  In addition to what you snipped, I said:  Heterosxuals just don't happen to get sex.  They must engage in some high risk behavior (barring of course blood transfusion or accidental exposure in the health care setting) 
 
&lt;em&gt;There is no denying, except in the politically correct world, that HIV and AIDS is prevalent in the homosexual male population. Heterosexual sex is unlikely to result in transmission unless one partner was involved in a high risk behavior one of which is men having sex with men.&lt;/em&gt;

That should put it more in context.

That is an absolute fact.  Heterosexual sex will not result in AIDS or transmission unless one or both partners has engaged in high risk behavior.

A completely monogamous heterosexual relationship will not result in AIDS (barring blood transfusion).

Your sources say that women contracted the disease from Heterosexual sex but it fails to indicate what risky behavior the partner had engaged in.  

Dan, will you scold him for using a source from 1997?

This is from the CDC:
During 1999 - 2002, approximately 64% of heterosexually acquired HIV infections reported in the United States occurred in females. The proportion of infected females was highest among persons aged 13--19 years, consistent with a previous finding (5). &lt;strong&gt;Survey data suggest that females in this age group engage in behaviors that place them at increased risk for acquiring HIV infections&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t you put the rest of it in there so they know the context.  In addition to what you snipped, I said:  Heterosxuals just don&#8217;t happen to get sex.  They must engage in some high risk behavior (barring of course blood transfusion or accidental exposure in the health care setting) </p>
<p><em>There is no denying, except in the politically correct world, that HIV and AIDS is prevalent in the homosexual male population. Heterosexual sex is unlikely to result in transmission unless one partner was involved in a high risk behavior one of which is men having sex with men.</em></p>
<p>That should put it more in context.</p>
<p>That is an absolute fact.  Heterosexual sex will not result in AIDS or transmission unless one or both partners has engaged in high risk behavior.</p>
<p>A completely monogamous heterosexual relationship will not result in AIDS (barring blood transfusion).</p>
<p>Your sources say that women contracted the disease from Heterosexual sex but it fails to indicate what risky behavior the partner had engaged in.  </p>
<p>Dan, will you scold him for using a source from 1997?</p>
<p>This is from the CDC:<br />
During 1999 &#8211; 2002, approximately 64% of heterosexually acquired HIV infections reported in the United States occurred in females. The proportion of infected females was highest among persons aged 13&#8212;19 years, consistent with a previous finding (5). <strong>Survey data suggest that females in this age group engage in behaviors that place them at increased risk for acquiring HIV infections</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
