Big Dog’s latest vomit

January 2, 2008 in Political Animals | 3 comments

The last time I challenged “Big Dog” to support his claims with facts, he chose to lie about the question I’d asked. Let’s see if he’ll fall back on his usual mendacity this time…

Voting Democrat is Bad for Your Health

Everyone of the Democrats wants some kind of universal health care that is paid for by taxpayers. They want ever person in this country covered (citizen or not) and they want to ensure that the government has its grubby little hands in the mix from beginning to end. What they want is to be able to make all the decisions for you. Over weight? You don’t get treated. Smoker, no treatment for you. Eat meat, you can’t be treated. Drink alcohol, too bad, so sad.


Okay, mutt boy, answer a few questions:


  1. Which Democratic proposal for universal health care stipulates that overweight patients will not be treated?
  2. Which Democratic proposal for universal health care stipulates that smokers will not be treated?
  3. Which Democratic proposal for universal health care stipulates that patients who eat meat will not be treated?
  4. Which Democratic proposal for universal health care stipulates that patients who drink alcohol will not be treated?

Run away now, lying cur.

UPDATE 01/03/07 10:33 AM EST: As expected, Big Dog is incapable of supporting his claims with facts.

Just for the record, I never said any candidate said you would not be treated if you did bad things. I said the government wants its grubby hands in the mix. Then I indicated what would not be covered based upon what is not covered in other countries that have socialized medicine.

Big Dog again chooses to deliberately misrepresent what I asked. Look at the questions above: the word “candidate” does not appear. I asked him to back up his claims regarding Democratic proposals for universal health care. And he cannot do that.

“What is not covered in other countries that have socialized medicine” is irrelevant. Big Dog specifically accused Democrats in this country of making proposals that limited who would be covered. He’s lying, and he knows it. That is why he runs away from simple, straightforward questions about his claims.

UPDATE 01/03/07 1:37 PM EST: Big Dog continues his evasion of four simple questions. He was lying about the Democratic proposals for universal health coverage, and he knows it.

  1. dan l on January 3, 2008 at 10:57 am

    I’ll never understand it.

    I’ve never been in favor of the government becoming an insurance provider. It requires too much bloat from the G and realistically it would probably not work out for either the medical sector nor the insurance sector.

    Now, on the other hand, should the government offer health care at the right cost having acted as a power buyer or broker, who’s got a beef with that?

  2. meatbrain on January 3, 2008 at 11:05 am

    Those are legitimate questions, and deserve to be debated. The point I am making is that Big Dog, and his fellow wingnuts, are not interested in an honest debate on this or most other issues. That is why they employ hyperbole and outright lies.