You are currently browsing the monthly archive for November, 2007.
The long silence here is not because I’ve fallen off a cliff (though there are no doubt those who would rejoice if I did), but because I have been dealing with the illness of a family member. The hiatus will continue a while longer, while I do some server cleanup and a long-overdue upgrade of Wordpress.
I’ll be back in due course. Play nice, children.
It’s amusing to watch the wingnuts trip over their own bile. Ogre has outed himself as a troll.
But this is the world of liberals today. They honestly believe that they are gods in America. They believe they know exactly how much people should pay for everything because they’re smarter than everyone else. And they hate freedom (even if they won’t admit it).
When you start telling me what my thoughts and feelings are, that’s not debate, so I choose not to participate. If you want to talk about reality and facts, I debate. When you just call names and make up crap because you want to, that’s just trolling.
Ogre can tell you what liberals believe and feel. But if someone dares do it to him — well, that’s just terrible. Only trolls do that.
Gotta love that wingnut hypocrisy.
UPDATE 11/09/07 7:28 AM EST: I am overjoyed to report that Raven has jumped in to make certain that the comedy never ends. First, she tells us how to detect a liberal:
And, liberals attack with emotions and hormonal based argument.
And in the very next sentence she outs herself as a liberal by employing a hormone-based argument:
...Your severe lacking of testosterone shows…
God, my sides hurt.
Religion has no place whatsoever in politics. At last, there is a party that understands this simple concept. Alas, they’re on the other side of the world…
(hat tip: PZ Myers)
Here’s a simple question for the wingnuts out there (Jay Stephenson, Dan Paden, Weasel Zipper, and Justin Higgins come to mind):
Is waterboarding torture?
If your answer is ‘no’, then when did it stop being torture? The US has historically prosecuted waterboarding as a crime. Why would that change? Why would we want it to?
Shakesville points us to Keith Olbermann’s latest, and brilliant, special comment on the subject of torture:
OH NOES! Cao has discovered a terrible conspiracy by the evil reptilian aliens running Google! They’re hiding the truth from the American people!
This excellent article at the American Thinker is no longer available if you do a google search for TNSDAAL VIRUS.
This is a clear picture of google’s manipulation of the flow of information.
...
I simply couldn’t believe it when I woke up this morning and saw the google results when I’ve been using google to get the url at the American Thinker for that article ever since I discovered it. Now I’m going to just use this blog’s archives and comments to get it.
(I had to shrink Cao’s screenshot a bit to fit it here. Here’s the screenshot in its original size.)
Hoo boy. Let’s go to the article that Cao can’t seem to find because of Google’s “manipulation of the flow of information”. Read the rest of this entry »
Changing the course of events is never as easy as you imagine it to be…
Some months ago, David Michael Green of Hofstra University published a straightforward chronology of the events surrounding the invasion of Iraq. It has garnered far too little notice in the blogosphere. Among the points he makes:
* As war loomed, Iraq made broad overtures to the United States to prevent an invasion, offering to allow full, on-the-ground, American weapons inspections, anti-terrorism cooperation, oil concessions, and even backing for the US position in an Israeli/Palestinian peace plan. The only thing Saddam balked at was regime change, but even then he offered to hold elections within two years’ time. The Americans were also informed by the Iraqis at the time that there were no existing WMD. The Iraqi representatives “could not understand why the Americans were focused on Iraq rather than on countries, like Iran, that have long supported terrorists”. The Bush administration rejected their offer, despite that it met every demand that Bush was publicly making.
* Saddam had never attacked the United States, nor even threatened to do so.
* In March of 2003, when the invasion was launched, Iraq was a gravely weakened military and economic power which could not seriously threaten its neighbors, let alone the United States. International sanctions had seriously damaged its economy and killed vast numbers of its citizens, including about 500,000 children. It had no serious weapons capability. It had lost control over two-thirds of its own airspace to American and British flyers.
* In November of 2002, the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 1441, requiring that Iraq declare its WMD, disarm, and allow inspections to verify that this has occurred. One week later Iraq announced that it would accept the resolution, and the weapons inspectors were simultaneously deployed.
* Iraq submitted a report to the UN, as required, indicating that it possessed no weapons of mass destruction. The Bush administration immediately and definitively asserted that Saddam was lying. In fact, since Iraq had no WMD, and since Bush claimed that Saddam was unquestionably lying in saying so, it was Bush who lied, not Saddam.
* Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said of the supposed Iraqi WMD, “We know where they are. They’re in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat”. But the United States government had never informed the UN weapons inspectors – a team that Bush had demanded be sent – of where to find those weapons.
* Two subsequent reports from teams sent to Iraq by the Bush administration itself revealed that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, though some people continue to this day to say there were some found there. Moreover, these teams scientifically confirmed that such weapons are neither missing nor hidden nor deported, but never existed after the mandated weapons destruction which followed the Gulf War.
* At one point Bush claimed that two small trailers found in the desert were mobile “biological laboratories” and thus declared, “We have found the weapons of mass destruction”, seemingly vindicating his decision to go to war. But even before he spoke, it was known by the Pentagon that these trailers had nothing to do with WMD production, and that fact was reported to Washington two days before the president’s statement. Bush and other administration officials continued to make the claim for nearly a year, despite an unequivocal report filed from the field stating that the trailers were not, and could not be, weapons labs. Scientists and engineers on the investigating team referred to the trailers as “”the biggest sand toilets in the world”.
* Added all together, what emerges from the above-listed facts is that all the carnage and destruction that has ensued was based on the case that Iraq was so imminent a threat – despite in fact being a very weak military power – that America could not wait four to six more weeks for the weapons inspectors to finish their work and reveal that it was no threat whatsoever.
There can be little doubt that history will not be kind to the President that took this country into war on the basis of lies, exaggerations, distortions, and jingoistic rhetoric.
