Yo Meat, can you get a preview button here?

Why do you support the insurgency meaty?

Pretty neat huh? Accuse someone of something with absolutely nothing, zilch to back it up and then continually ask them why they support it.

A fuckin’ 3rd grader can come up with better logic than this. I know it’s a tough job, Mr. Meat, but hang in there. Somebody had to occupy the low-hanging fruit.

For an example of an unconditional warmonger who almost makes Jim look disinterested, see this moron. The most striking thing all pro-war nuts share at this point is the belief that any questioning of how this grossly failed war has been conducted, period, amounts to rooting for the enemy. That’s it. They have no fucking concept of a middle ground, which helps explain why most of them are extremist in other ways (religion, gun ownership, abortion, etc.).

A fairly ambitious and learned 11-year-old can see that “If you’re not totally on board with this plan (which in the case of Iraq is a dishonest and failed one), then you want the other side to win” is childish and inane. But so are wingnuts like the one you find under whatever rocks and shithunks you keep overturning.

I have conducted an honest discussion.

False. The use of the loaded question, and intellectually dishonest tactic, is further evidence that shitmonkey cannot conduct an honest discussion.

I understand using a nuclear threat on a valuable target.

False. Shitmonkey understands nothing of the repercussions of the use of such a threat. It is afraid to even discuss those repercussions.

You have proven that you don’t understand the word deterrent…

False. Shitmonkey is afraid to discuss the alleged “deterrent”, and seeks to derail the discussion by making an ad hominem attack.

...and still refuse to explain why you support the insurgency.

Mu.

No matter how long you avoid answering the question there it remains, unanswered and mocking your cowardice in honestly answering it.

Answer the question meathead. Why do you support the insurgency?

This is, of course, a loaded question, designed to smear me as a supporter of the insurgency rather than to advance any real argument. Gain has not yet learned to ask honest questions.

meaty makes comments to try to bolster his bs arguments, yet is utterly unable to actually make that occur.

meaty makes comments…..and we laugh…...

I would suggest that if you are going to pretend you are something other than what you are that you eliminate your blogroll and archives. Idiot.

Gain claims that I am “supporting the insurgency”. He has presented not one shred of evidence to support this claim.

Gain claims that I am a liar. He has presented not one shred of evidence to support this claim.

Gain claims that “the BBC is cheering for the other side”. He has presented not one shred of evidence to support this claim.

Gain claims that Hoft has ”[proven] who the liars are.”. He has presented not one shred of evidence to support this claim.

Gain is very good at making claims. He is utterly unable to supply factual evidence for any of his claims.

I realize this guy’s a complete meathead, however every once in a while I like to go into the gutter and remind these rats that they’re fooling no one with their adolescent word games. This guy pretends that a leftard infested network which is so pathetic it apologized to the Iranian hostage takers for referring to them as hostage takers (sic) isn’t part of the problem.

Hoft has an update which proves who the liars are. As usual they are on the sinister side.

So meaty, you are saying that Iran is not supplying weapons to iraqi insurgents?

Why do you support the insurgency meaty?

The shitmonkey is unable to conduct an honest, rational discussion, so it falls back to the most transparent of intellectually dishonest tactics, the loaded question.