Your claim that “Nobody is allowed their opinion in Meatheads world” is clearly false. Those who disagree with me post comments on this blog often, and I do not change their words. Justin has chosen to delete comments that disagree with his views, and he also edits my comments on his blog to make it appear that I have said things that I did not, in fact, say. Justin is lying about what I have written in those comments. It is telling that you have chosen not only to lie about my policies, but that you also fail to criticize Justin for his proven dishonesty. It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that you approve of any dishonest tactic Justin might choose to employ, simply because you agree with his politics.

If you have actual evidence that I am guilty of “child abuse”, Cao, I suggest that you contact law enforcement at once.

Hey grown up man with children, does it make you feel like a big man to bully a child?

Since you can’t take on someone your own size and have been relegated to picking on teenagers, I just have to laugh at the vastness your stupidity.

Nobody is allowed their opinion in Meatheads world…because if it differs with Meathead he has to find a way to poke fun, ridicule and deflect.

So sorry for you, meathead. What does your wife think of your tendency toward child abuse???

So, with my comment of 4/15 above as evidence, can one assume that there’s an “intellectual property for me but not for thee” attitude? That there’s a righty plagiarism ring? Do you think Cao or Kinder messaged Justin saying, “Do it! Do it! He he he he!”

Nah. Has to be a coincidence.

It probably has more to do with the assloads of wp plugins that guy runs.

And so with his commenters, too, it seems. Why are they jubilantly dancing around the “fraudulent site” screen shot as if it proves Justin’s conjecture? Yes, there is a screen shot. No, it doesn’t constitute proof, backup, foundation, basis, or evidence for his “deduction” in explanation.

No one is arguing against them that the “self-inflicted virus” (as Norton is described in the comments) Justin uses gave him a false result. The argument must revolve around the conclusion that Justin comes to based upon the false positive.

He’s got nothing.