Dan Paden: still as dishonest as ever

Dan Paden is at it again. He’s pretending that the Right doesn’t use eliminationist rhetoric more often than the Left, in the face of clear evidence

…they make it hard for you to be taken seriously.

Employing fundamentally dishonest arguments makes it hard for anyone to take you seriously, Paden.

…these characters will count, as I said, dead-lawyer jokes told by the Right as a real threats…

Fine. Show us several examples of an actual ‘dead lawyer joke’ being counted as a ‘real’ death threat, Paden.

Go ahead. Post the evidence for your claim.

…[the Left] discount[s] threats and nastiness from the Left as mere joking, or blowing off steam, or — rarely — admit that it exists, but discount it as infrequent (it isn’t, as any quick perusal of the comments at Democratic Underground will demonstrate)…

One site… wow. Amazing. Were these comments posted by the blog owner, the way Ann Coulter’s are?

Remember when you got caught lying about what ‘eliminationist rhetoric’ meant? And when challenged, you changed your tune and claimed you had been comparing two classes of rhetoric? Nothing like a blatant lie to kill your credibility, Paden.

You were also challenged to name the specific Democratic candidates for President who had murdered a baby, after you made a fact-free accusation. Your silence was profound.

You are a liar and a coward, Paden. You’ll never be anything more.

…should you dare to suggest otherwise, attempt to shut you up by challenging you to produce a detailed count of such comments by both Right and Left…

Which you know you cannot do. Thus you pretend that no evidence is necessary—we should all just take the ever-so-pious Dan Paden at his word.

You are a liar and a coward, Paden. You’ll never be anything more.