Lying lizardbitch Cao just cannot let go of a lie, no matter what. She still claims that Valerie Plame was not covert. In doing so, of course, she is implying that CIA Director General Michael Hayden, a Bush appointee, must have been lying:
Plame’s testimony on the covert nature of her job was buttressed by a statement that Waxman read at the hearing’s opening which, he said, was approved by Gen. Michael V. Hayden, the CIA’s director. The statement said that Plame worked in a covert capacity at the time of Novak’s column and that her employment status was classified under an executive order.
Only by ignoring the facts and twisting reality can Cao continue to spread this lie. Of course, ignoring the facts and twisting reality are the only talents that pathetic, mendacious asswipe has ever had.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Proudly Hosted By
3 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://thinkingmeat.net/2007/03/23/cao-persists-in-a-thoroughly-debunked-lie/trackback/
March 23, 2007 at 2:55 pm
pansexualpeace
Not that I disagree with this stance on Cao, but wouldn’t you also agree that you exhibit those same endearing character traits?
Now, I hate Cao just as much as anyone with any rational sense, but for you it just seems a little hypocritical.
March 24, 2007 at 7:35 am
Pete_Meathead is my whipping boy_Bondurant
zinger!!!! Once again the Meathead is dummied. Hey meathead! If Plame was covert why was a crime not committed in this case? Can you answer that or will you resort to your same old tired tactics of answering a question with a question? Please prove you can formulate an argument. If Plame was covert why was nobody charged?
March 24, 2007 at 8:24 am
meatbrain
“If Plame was covert…”
There is no longer a question whether Plame was covert. The Director of the CIA has confirmed that she was. Petey would be well advised to keep up with current events, lest he make a fool of himself yet again.
”...why was a crime not committed in this case?”
A crime was committed. The identity of a covert agent was revealed. Whether anyone can be charged in the case, given Lewis Libby’s perjury, remains to be seen.