On the inanity scale, Heidi "call me a cold-hearted bitch" Thiess and Kit "support-marines-who-kill-women-and-children" Jarrell fall somewhere between ‘pathetic’ and ‘ludicrous’. Their latest pile of crap only serves to confirm this. Something happened to their site, and Kit is claiming to know that the (supposed) hacker was a liberal:
I’ve finally gotten a working install of Wordpress on here after the liberal hack that took us down for 3 days…
Can these two get any more stupid? News flash, ladies: it is not possible to know the political orientation of a hacker just by looking at the logs of a server that has been hacked. Can’t be done. What you are engaging in here is pure fantasy. Anyone could have hacked your server… or the problems with the site could have been a result of your own incompetence. (The best you could come up with was a two-week-old backup? Good grief…)
But then, we are all used to seeing you make utter fools of yourself in public. In that, at least, you shine.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Proudly Hosted By
7 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://thinkingmeat.net/2007/03/14/idiocy-from-the-redheaded-cretins-again/trackback/
March 14, 2007 at 6:33 pm
Kit Jarrell
I was wondering if you even still liked us, since we hadn’t gotten one of your screeds in a while. Good to know you still have a thing for us.
March 14, 2007 at 6:35 pm
meatbrain
Notice, Kit, that you are entirely unable — and unwilling — to defend your claim that the hacker must have been a “liberal”.
Intellectual courage has never been one of your strong suits.
March 14, 2007 at 11:16 pm
Kit Jarrell
I don’t have to defend myself to you. I know what went on behind the scenes. You don’t. I know who’s been messing with our hotel reservations. I know who posted a threat on the forum threatening to slit our throats. I have the info on who hacked our site. And yes, authorities have been notified. But don’t let the context or facts get in your way.
March 15, 2007 at 5:38 am
meatbrain
What facts would those be, Kit? All you’ve presented are more unsupported allegations — again.
March 15, 2007 at 6:04 pm
Kit Jarrell
Again…I don’t have to give my facts to you so you can decide whether or not you approve. But nice try.
Enjoy your weekend!
March 15, 2007 at 7:15 pm
meatbrain
It isn’t a question of “approval”, Kit. The simple fact is that you can’t be believed because you are a known liar.
March 23, 2007 at 7:58 pm
blf
Kit, you might believe you don’t have to present evidence to ThinkingMeat.
But you should present some to me—I am a computer “security” expert, and know damn well ThinkingMeat’s claim that a person’s belief’s cannot be deduced from your server’s audit trail is sound. In fact, you cannot even tell if it was a person as opposed to, say, a cat walking on the keyboard (albeit that is extraordinarily unlikely). More to the point, it could just as easily be the CIA or other insert bogeyman here.
Evidence to be present in this blog, please: You’ve publically alleged you can tell beliefs from the data on you server. Now, either prove it or retract it.