Dan Paden vomits another lie

February 15, 2007 in Political Animals | 6 comments

The fundamentally dishonest Dan Paden is at it again. After approvingly quoting some content-free pap from known liar Ann Coulter, he rips off this gem:

Of course, the incredible field of complete nutballs and barely-concealed, baby-murdering, Christophobic socialists that the Democrats seem determined to run for president is actually good news, in a way.

Hey Danny… which of the current field of announced Democratic candidates for President have murdered a baby? Don’t be coy, you mendacious sack of pig vomit. Name some specific names.

Of course, Danny won’t dare respond. He knows that he’d have to back up his accusation with facts — and facts are poison to lying cowards like Dan Paden.

  1. Pete_Bondurant on February 16, 2007 at 12:45 pm

    Oh yeah, you guys call it “pro-choice.” Thanks for the link to the site moron, I like what this guy has to say. Question- Am I the only one who visits this sorry ass site? Meathead- dead from the neck up.

  2. meatbrain on February 16, 2007 at 2:08 pm

    Petey, can you provide any evidence that any of the current field of announced Democratic candidates for President have murdered a baby? Dan Paden lacks the guts to provide proof for his claim. Do you have the backbone that Dan lacks?

  3. Pete_Bondurant on February 16, 2007 at 11:20 pm

    Well your buddy Barrack “wasted” Obama seems to not mind if a child who is about 5 minutes away from life is destroyed. To me that is accessory to murder which is just as bad as murder. So you can go ahead and give your pro-abortion talking points now but frankly I do not care.
    I also love the fact that you seem not to mind that the jackass field of contenders are also “Christophobic socialists.” I guess you agree with him there.
    Hey, do I get something for being one of the three visitors of this site?

  4. meatbrain on February 17, 2007 at 12:12 am

    “Well your buddy Barrack “wasted” Obama…”

    I don’t know the man, Petey. Keep your fantasies out of the discussion, please.

    ”...seems to not mind if a child who is about 5 minutes away from life is destroyed.”

    Can you back that claim up with facts, Petey? Is there something specific he has said that leads you to believe this?

    “To me that is accessory to murder which is just as bad as murder.”

    Your views on the matter are irrelevant. If you are going to accuse a man of being an “accessory to murder”, you had damn well better know what it means. Cite the accepted legal definition of the term, Petey.

    “So you can go ahead and give your pro-abortion talking points now but frankly I do not care.”

    We aren’t discussing my views, Petey. Try to pay attention.

    “I also love the fact that you seem not to mind that the jackass field of contenders are also “Christophobic socialists.” I guess you agree with him there.”

    Wrong again, Petey. It’s just that it has become painfully obvious that you are not capable of discussing more than one topic at a time — and even that seems to be a strain for you.

  5. Pete_Bondurant on February 17, 2007 at 8:01 am

    Unbelievable. If you are going to set up a blog you better know what you are talking about. Check Obama’s record, fool. Haven’t we gone through this before? When challenged you try to avoid the argument. Let’s try this again. To pro-lifers like myself people like Obama and Hillary Clinton who not only support abortion but support partial-birth abortion are at the very least accessories to murder. Get it yet? Can you comprehend that or are you just too dense? Just as whacky leftists (the sites you provide links to for example) have no problem calling our elected president a murderer, I have no problem labelling people like Obama and Clinton the murderers as well….Moron.
    Look at that- 5 comments on this blog…..a new record….you’re welcome…idiot.

  6. meatbrain on February 17, 2007 at 8:24 am

    “Check Obama’s record, fool.”

    Request denied. You made the claim. You have to back it up.

    “Haven’t we gone through this before? When challenged you try to avoid the argument.”

    False. You have been challenged, and you are refusing to back up your claim with facts.

    “To pro-lifers like myself people like Obama and Hillary Clinton who not only support abortion but support partial-birth abortion are at the very least accessories to murder. Get it yet?”

    I understand that you are redefining “accessory to murder” to mean something that it does not mean in the real world. Your personal lexical fantasies are of no interest whatsoever. Stick to reality.

    “I have no problem labelling people like Obama and Clinton the murderers as well…”

    You have no problem confusing your fantasies with reality. That much is crystal clear. But you are unable to answer the question I posed to Dan Paden.