Comments on: Must be a good day for liars… http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/ It's meat! And it thinks! Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:09:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Rich http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-4350 Rich Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:57:02 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-4350 thoughts on this? http://www.halfsigma.com/2006/06/liberals_smarte.html thoughts on this?

http://www.halfsigma.com/2006/06/liberals_smarte.html

]]> By: meatbrain http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-4074 meatbrain Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:33:12 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-4074 I think kender has reached the point that he deserves his very own avatar here, so I've given him one. I'll be adding it to all his past comments. I think kender has reached the point that he deserves his very own avatar here, so I’ve given him one. I’ll be adding it to all his past comments.

]]> By: Junk http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-4013 Junk Sat, 30 Dec 2006 05:43:46 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-4013 This is funny. You flock to this guy's site with conservative righteousness ready to fling witty comments like "zingo Warwitch". The truth is that you needed this desperately. Just at the point that you're all getting tired of hearing each other beat off over pictures of guns, explosions and the macho marines that make them, finally, here is someone that gives you the smallest amount of validation by disagreeing with you. You couldn't resist the urge to link here so that you can finally point at something that gives you an excuse to spend your days and nights on the internet that doesn't involve chatting with underaged pinays. Congrats. This is funny. You flock to this guy’s site with conservative righteousness ready to fling witty comments like “zingo Warwitch”. The truth is that you needed this desperately. Just at the point that you’re all getting tired of hearing each other beat off over pictures of guns, explosions and the macho marines that make them, finally, here is someone that gives you the smallest amount of validation by disagreeing with you. You couldn’t resist the urge to link here so that you can finally point at something that gives you an excuse to spend your days and nights on the internet that doesn’t involve chatting with underaged pinays. Congrats.

]]> By: kender http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3843 kender Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:04:32 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3843 <img src='/images/kendermonkey100x100.jpg' width='100' height='100' class='floatleft'/> zingo Warwitch.....that was funny. zingo Warwitch…..that was funny.

]]> By: Warwitch http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3821 Warwitch Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:53:43 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3821 If you don’t understand what’s in print, meat, it’s not his job to explain it to you. If you don’t understand what’s in print, meat, it’s not his job to explain it to you.

]]> By: meatbrain http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3808 meatbrain Fri, 29 Dec 2006 02:33:50 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3808 <em>"I fail to see how calling him a name..."</em> Calling who, and what name? <em>"...and making a comment that you do not support with facts..."</em> To which comment do you refer? <em>"John Kerry’s statement about the troops and how being uneducated lands them in Iraq."</em> Cite the specific statement that you refer to, please. “I fail to see how calling him a name…”

Calling who, and what name?

”...and making a comment that you do not support with facts…”

To which comment do you refer?

“John Kerry’s statement about the troops and how being uneducated lands them in Iraq.”

Cite the specific statement that you refer to, please.

]]> By: Big Dog http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3807 Big Dog Fri, 29 Dec 2006 02:18:46 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3807 And you will note that I do not simply ”[call] someone names”. I provide factual support for my statements when I point out that someone is lying, or advocating violence as an instrument of political change, or whatever. Let us note in passing that whereas Wuterich can only be accused of lying, it is assumed by the wingnuts that the Iraqis must be lying. I fail to see how calling him a name and making a comment that you do not support with facts squares up with what I quoted from you in the first paragraph. Could you explain that so i can understand. I would not want you to have to rat yourself out as a liar. BTW, John Kerry's statement about the troops and how being uneducated lands them in Iraq. In your opinion, he meant it or he was trying to make a joke? And you will note that I do not simply ”[call] someone names”. I provide factual support for my statements when I point out that someone is lying, or advocating violence as an instrument of political change, or whatever.

Let us note in passing that whereas Wuterich can only be accused of lying, it is assumed by the wingnuts that the Iraqis must be lying.

I fail to see how calling him a name and making a comment that you do not support with facts squares up with what I quoted from you in the first paragraph.

Could you explain that so i can understand. I would not want you to have to rat yourself out as a liar.

BTW, John Kerry’s statement about the troops and how being uneducated lands them in Iraq. In your opinion, he meant it or he was trying to make a joke?

]]> By: meatbrain http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3804 meatbrain Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:57:22 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3804 I comment on what I find interesting on any given day. And what I usually find interesting -- and all too common -- is the predilection that the wingers have for lying outright. And you will note that I do not simply "[call] someone names". I provide factual support for my statements when I point out that someone is lying, or advocating violence as an instrument of political change, or whatever. I comment on what I find interesting on any given day. And what I usually find interesting — and all too common — is the predilection that the wingers have for lying outright.

And you will note that I do not simply ”[call] someone names”. I provide factual support for my statements when I point out that someone is lying, or advocating violence as an instrument of political change, or whatever.

]]> By: kender http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3803 kender Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:56:24 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3803 <img src='/images/kendermonkey100x100.jpg' width='100' height='100' class='floatleft'/> Bwahahahaa.....gimme a dollar. Bwahahahaa…..gimme a dollar.

]]> By: ric ottaiano http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3802 ric ottaiano Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:52:15 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3802 Out of curiosity, why do you spend most of your time "debunking" others and very little on any kind of original thought or analysis? I know the former is easier since calling someone names can't fall prey to fact-checking, but you'd be much more persuasive (assuming that's your goal of course) if you'd actually make a cogent argument backed up with facts and links. Out of curiosity, why do you spend most of your time “debunking” others and very little on any kind of original thought or analysis? I know the former is easier since calling someone names can’t fall prey to fact-checking, but you’d be much more persuasive (assuming that’s your goal of course) if you’d actually make a cogent argument backed up with facts and links.

]]> By: meatbrain http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3379 meatbrain Sat, 23 Dec 2006 16:33:58 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3379 If you don't understand what's in print, it's not my job to explain it to you. Let us note in passing that whereas Wuterich can only be accused of lying, it is assumed by the wingnuts that the Iraqis must be lying. If you don’t understand what’s in print, it’s not my job to explain it to you.

Let us note in passing that whereas Wuterich can only be accused of lying, it is assumed by the wingnuts that the Iraqis must be lying.

]]> By: Warwitch http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3378 Warwitch Sat, 23 Dec 2006 15:32:14 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3378 I read your link but didn't find mention of how one of the Marines lied about how the Iraqis died. Did I just miss it? I see how the sergeant is ACCUSED of lying, but that doesn't mean he lied. Could you please put the excerpt here in your comment for little ole me? Merry A Few Days Off Of Work For No Good Reason! I read your link but didn’t find mention of how one of the Marines lied about how the Iraqis died. Did I just miss it?

I see how the sergeant is ACCUSED of lying, but that doesn’t mean he lied. Could you please put the excerpt here in your comment for little ole me?

Merry A Few Days Off Of Work For No Good Reason!

]]> By: meatbrain http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3371 meatbrain Sat, 23 Dec 2006 13:30:22 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3371 No feathers ruffled here. I have comments open here so that people can comment. And unlike Heidi and Kit, I do not instantly delete comments that disagree with me. And has anyone asked Heidi why at least one of the Marines involved in the Haditha killings initially "lied about how the Iraqi civilians died":http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/states/california/northern_california/16302242.htm? No feathers ruffled here. I have comments open here so that people can comment. And unlike Heidi and Kit, I do not instantly delete comments that disagree with me.

And has anyone asked Heidi why at least one of the Marines involved in the Haditha killings initially lied about how the Iraqi civilians died?

]]> By: Warwitch http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3340 Warwitch Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:49:32 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/12/22/must-be-a-good-day-for-liars/#comment-3340 Hmmm...<a href="http://euphoricreality.com/2006/12/22/iraqis-and-their-lies/" rel="nofollow">Lies</a>. Must be the theme of the day. Since you're the self-ordained LIE POLICE, where's your big headline: "<a href="http://euphoricreality.com/2006/12/22/unraveling-haditha/" rel="nofollow">The Iraqis Lie Again</a>"? Heheh. That ought to ruffle your feathers. Happy Indeterminate Non-Religious Winter Holiday. Hmmm…Lies. Must be the theme of the day.

Since you’re the self-ordained LIE POLICE, where’s your big headline: “The Iraqis Lie Again”?

Heheh. That ought to ruffle your feathers.

Happy Indeterminate Non-Religious Winter Holiday.

]]>