By the way, intelligence experts agree that all of these sadistic torture tactics are only good for forcing false confessions, whereas effective interrogation involves winning the prisoner over with persuasion and the Stockholm syndrome. Not that it matters, because a lot of these detainees were obtained on rumors and arrested on the thinnest pretense. Their value as intelligence assetts is nil.

Upon reading your post, I found myself both becoming rather angered and laughing to myself about your total lack of tact, lack of intelligence, and lack of ability to well argue a point. Generally if you’re going to argue another’s opinion about something you need to have facts and evidence to prove your own theory/opinion. Too bad your post is missing these aforementioned items and then makes up for it by showing your total ignorance and ability to be a pompous ass. I considered myself a liberal….until I became better educated and I advise you do the same since you seem to be incapable of backing your own counterattack with proof of what you’re saying. You have no argument here. All you’ve done in this post is call Mr. Richardson a “dipshit.” Any dumbass can say such a thing…..although I suppose this would explain why you did so. Good luck on all of your future posts and actually gaining the ability to carry on a good argument that actually says something other than repeating all that another has said.