Comments on: Hard questions for Kat http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/08/13/hard-questions-for-cat/ It's meat! And it thinks! Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:49:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Beaming Visionary http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/08/13/hard-questions-for-cat/#comment-1335 Beaming Visionary Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:35:43 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/08/13/hard-questions-for-cat/#comment-1335 Out of all the craven, illiterate, hypocritical, dishonest right-wing pissants meatbrain, myself and others have dug up over time, I'd say Kender stands head and shoulders above the others. That in itself constitutes some sort of achievement, albeit a dubious one. The man (so to speak) does nothing but rave away in blind fury, produce repeated bursts of violent intentions (which fortunately exist only as sheer fantasy), ban dissent from his blog despite posting "Feel free to post comments, rants, or even personal attacks" and "You can say anything you want here" in the sidebar, and complain bitterly about this odious jugernaut he calls "the Left," which he believes in the throes of his parania is responsible for constant attempts to destroy America from within via the promulgation of faggotry, efforts to keep guns out of the hands of trigger-happy rednecks and crooks, the removal of any and all traces of Christianity from the public sphere (including the regular razing of churches), the "murder" of as many blastocysts and zygotes as humanly possible, the daily importation of millions of illegal Mexican immigrants, and the training of youngsters to one day develop into pederast NAMBLA members moonlighting as ACLU lawyers and communist spies. That about right, Kender? I think I must have left a few liberal evils out. Out of all the craven, illiterate, hypocritical, dishonest right-wing pissants meatbrain, myself and others have dug up over time, I’d say Kender stands head and shoulders above the others. That in itself constitutes some sort of achievement, albeit a dubious one. The man (so to speak) does nothing but rave away in blind fury, produce repeated bursts of violent intentions (which fortunately exist only as sheer fantasy), ban dissent from his blog despite posting “Feel free to post comments, rants, or even personal attacks” and “You can say anything you want here” in the sidebar, and complain bitterly about this odious jugernaut he calls “the Left,” which he believes in the throes of his parania is responsible for constant attempts to destroy America from within via the promulgation of faggotry, efforts to keep guns out of the hands of trigger-happy rednecks and crooks, the removal of any and all traces of Christianity from the public sphere (including the regular razing of churches), the “murder” of as many blastocysts and zygotes as humanly possible, the daily importation of millions of illegal Mexican immigrants, and the training of youngsters to one day develop into pederast NAMBLA members moonlighting as ACLU lawyers and communist spies. That about right, Kender? I think I must have left a few liberal evils out.

]]> By: meatbrain http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/08/13/hard-questions-for-cat/#comment-1334 meatbrain Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:12:22 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/08/13/hard-questions-for-cat/#comment-1334 You know full well, Kender, that I can post to Kat's blog any time I want to. Kat failed to answer the questions I put to her after she agreed to do so. I gave Kat an opportunity to demonstrate that she could conduct an honest, open discussion with integrity, and she showed conclusively that she is incapable of doing so. And take a moment, Kender, to reflect on the differences between Kat and myself. Kat is asked some inconvenient questions, and she responds first by refusing to answer. Then she agrees to answer the questions, and finally she reneges on her agreement and bans the questioner. By contrast, you come here to my blog, "threaten to kill me":http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/01/02/those-who-cannot-learn-from-history/#comment-71, and you still haven't been banned. Who is more willing to open and continue a dialog -- Kat, or myself? Note that no one, myself least of all, expects you to give an honest answer to that question... You know full well, Kender, that I can post to Kat’s blog any time I want to. Kat failed to answer the questions I put to her after she agreed to do so.

I gave Kat an opportunity to demonstrate that she could conduct an honest, open discussion with integrity, and she showed conclusively that she is incapable of doing so.

And take a moment, Kender, to reflect on the differences between Kat and myself. Kat is asked some inconvenient questions, and she responds first by refusing to answer. Then she agrees to answer the questions, and finally she reneges on her agreement and bans the questioner. By contrast, you come here to my blog, threaten to kill me, and you still haven’t been banned.

Who is more willing to open and continue a dialog — Kat, or myself? Note that no one, myself least of all, expects you to give an honest answer to that question…

]]> By: kender http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/08/13/hard-questions-for-cat/#comment-1333 kender Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:21:08 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/08/13/hard-questions-for-cat/#comment-1333 <img src='/images/kendermonkey100x100.jpg' width='100' height='100' class='floatleft'/> HA!!!! You got banned bitch!!!!! HA!!!! You got banned bitch!!!!!

]]> By: meatbrain http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/08/13/hard-questions-for-cat/#comment-1331 meatbrain Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:33:28 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/08/13/hard-questions-for-cat/#comment-1331 Giving Kat and her ilk the opportunity to display their dishonesty and incompetence is one of the primary reasons why I visit their blogs. Giving Kat and her ilk the opportunity to display their dishonesty and incompetence is one of the primary reasons why I visit their blogs.

]]> By: Beaming Visionary http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/08/13/hard-questions-for-cat/#comment-1328 Beaming Visionary Sun, 13 Aug 2006 19:55:44 +0000 http://thinkingmeat.net/2006/08/13/hard-questions-for-cat/#comment-1328 Where do you find so many cracy and benighted people? Watching the nutzos get all up in arms and attack you while avoiding your questions is an interesting exercise in Internet sociology. People on Kat's blog complain that you "make the rounds," exist only to harass right-wingers, merely want your blog to be more popular, have no solution to the "Muslim problem," etc., etc., but strip away these ad hominems and it's painfully clear that Kat has no answers to your questions, at least none that don't make her uncomfortable. The fact that she has so many equally dishonest and incompetent supporters and sycophants on her own site may place your CatHouse posts in the distinct minority, but this does nothing to hide Kat's clumsy and painfully obvious duck-'em-dodge-'em tactics. This is one thing that the nutters just don't get: Simply circling the wagons and making noise is not a viable substitute for dealing in actual facts. Where do you find so many cracy and benighted people?

Watching the nutzos get all up in arms and attack you while avoiding your questions is an interesting exercise in Internet sociology. People on Kat’s blog complain that you “make the rounds,” exist only to harass right-wingers, merely want your blog to be more popular, have no solution to the “Muslim problem,” etc., etc., but strip away these ad hominems and it’s painfully clear that Kat has no answers to your questions, at least none that don’t make her uncomfortable.

The fact that she has so many equally dishonest and incompetent supporters and sycophants on her own site may place your CatHouse posts in the distinct minority, but this does nothing to hide Kat’s clumsy and painfully obvious duck-’em-dodge-’em tactics. This is one thing that the nutters just don’t get: Simply circling the wagons and making noise is not a viable substitute for dealing in actual facts.

]]>