Heidi Thiess Kit Jarrell: admitted liar

I suppose that by now, I should not be surprised when the extreme right fringe of the blogosphere vomits forth yet another individual who cannot refrain from lying. Sadly, there seems to be an infinite supply of such bloggers. Heidi Thiess Kit Jarrell at Euphoric Reality just proved that she is quite willing to lie, and she’s even bragging about it.

Yesterday, I noted that Kit’s co-blogger Heidi had been gulled by an outfit that claimed the deaths in Qana were caused by a Hezbollah IED. I also posted a trackback to that post. Here’s the original trackback, which is a short excerpt from yesterday’s post:

It so happens that the building was in fact destroyed by an Israeli airstrike. What is my source for that assertion? The Israel Defense Force itself…
Today, the content of that trackback on Heidi’s site has been altered. It now reads as follows:
It so happens that I cannot seem to stop drooling over Kit and Heidi. I’m obsessed, and I can’t stop posting about them. What is it about redheads? Love them. Anyway, someone please visit my blog. Please? Seriously. I need hits.

[Note: the above comment was edited by Kit because Thinking Meat is anything but thinking, and frankly, we’re having fun with this whole stalker thing.]
By changing my words, Heidi Kit has deliberately misquoted me — in short, she is lying about what I’ve said. Heidi Kit has clearly communicated two things by her decision to change the trackback:

  1. She is willing to deliberately lie about what someone else has said. She is, in fact, proud of the fact that she has lied.
  2. She is afraid to participate in a serious, fact-based discussion of the Israeli attacks on Lebanon.

I would guess that Heidi Kit learned this tactic from Kender MacGowan. It seems the old folk wisdom is correct: when you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas.

The bottom line is this: Heidi Thiess Kit Jarrell lies, and admits doing it. Anyone reading her work will have to take this into account, before deciding whether what she has to say is at all credible.

Additional proof of ER, Mrs. Heidi Thiess’ continued lies, distorts, and tricks are as follows:

http://www.i-served.com/GaryLinderer/GaryLinderer_BloggerGate.htm

If Heidi’s worst day in her life, as she wrote in her bio was the day that she got out of the Army why is it that she is not back in the military helping in the fight in the war we have today? Was she asked or ordered to get out of the Army? Receiving only the rank of a LT after a normal enlistment of 3 years is substandard. I believe, it was her ignorance in the Army, her intolerance, know-it-all attitude and rudeness to people she deemed beneath her that forced her to be asked to leave the Army. We’ll never know unless she has the guts to show us military records. I sent her mine and she used it to justify her end means in her ten parts series “BROTHER AGAINST BROTHER.” The lies in that are some many I need to write a book about these two Bloggers in the one I am working on about these 25 so-called nonfiction book authors that I have exposed with the U.S. National Archive Records.

Keep up the fire and always remember that a liar is a liar is a liar.

Don C. Hall

Isn’t Heidi Theiss the former madam to the stars or whatever? Oh, wait—that’s Fleiss.

Anyway, has anyone else noticed that these winger-bloggers are far more concerned with site hits than content? They actually invoke the presumed number of page views of their opponents’ blogs as a defense against reasoned challenges to their bullshit, e.g., “Like anyone cares what someone says on a blog no one reads.” As if truth depends on traffic. Exhibit A in opposition to that line of reasoning: Michelle Malkin. Besides, as Gribbit and others have shown, these people use grossly distorted tools in order to claim higher rankings than they actually merit.

It’s also funny that anyone punching holes in a wingnut’s arguments on a regular basis is automatically branded a “stalker.” This is a euphemism, apparently, for “person who continually upsets me by exposing my lies in the presence of my sycophantic fellow morons.”

Anyone who alters someone else’s trackback is nothing but a craven, cognitively impotent shitbag desperate to continue trying to believe her own invented facts. What a loser. I’m glad she’s out of the military.

First of all, you’re even more of an idiot than I thought. What about the following do you not understand?

****[Note: the above comment was edited by Kit…]****

Heidi wasn’t responsible for the trackback, I was. If you want to pick a fight, the least you could do is read the quote before getting all hot in the pants and plastering it on your blog. Your fight is with me, not Heidi, which of course makes your entire post a farce. However, I’ll tell Heidi not to hold her breath waiting for an apology.

Why don’t you ever trash Instapundit? Or Blackfive? or any of the other bigger blogs? Why camp out on the Wideawakes blogs, and ours in particular? Perhaps you can shed some light on that for me. By the way, I’m not in the Wideawakes anymore, so maybe you can go find someone else to annoy.

Lastly, don’t bother leaving trackbacks on our site. They’ll either be blocked or deleted, whichever comes first. Keep your trash on your side of the fence.

I know you claim to have been responsible for the edit, Kit. I don’t much care who made the actual changes. The post was Heidi’s, and I hold her responsible for the lie.

Neither of you have the intellectual courage to engage in an honest, rational discussion. The fact that you two deliberately lie about what others say is proof of that.

You are holding Heidi responsible, and you don’t really care who actually did it. Now THAT is amusing. At least you exposed your true motive…just a desire to harass. You don’t even harass the right person – that’s the truly amusing part. You just want Heidi’s head on a platter.

By the way, you wouldn’t know rational, honest discussion if your life depended on it. You’re more than welcome to come on our show, and I guarantee you it wouldn’t be an ambush. I know how much you prefer hiding in email and blog comments, however. And yes, I mean to use the word “hiding.” There’s no reason for you to continually dodge the “honest, rational discussion” we’re inviting you to. But you will, because you’d rather hide over here and throw stones from behind your little pseudonym.

I’m done playing with you. Like I said, don’t bother coming over anymore. It’ll all just be deleted.

“It’ll all just be deleted.”

Which means that you do not want a discussion, Kit. That much is obvious. The fact that you and Heidi post lies about what other people say is simply more evidence of your fear of real debate.

I feel dirty being over here, but Meatbrain prefers to do this in public.

Meatbrain, it is one thing to disagree with someone politically, it is quite another to knowingly put someone else’s family in jeopardy, or to libel someone you do not know.

And you call me a coward? Answer me this, Meatbrain. What is your name? You know mine…do you have the courage to tell me what your name is? Or are you too cowardly to stand up and claim the statements you’ve made? Do you not have the moral courage as a man to tell me who you are? Feel free to email it to me if you don’t have the courage to post it on your blog.

I’m quite sure I already know the answer to those questions, but you have the opportunity to change my mind. What will you do?

“Meatbrain, it is one thing to disagree with someone politically, it is quite another to knowingly put someone else’s family in jeopardy, or to libel someone you do not know.”

What ‘jeopardy’ have I placed your family in, Heidi?

What ‘libel’ have I supposedly committed?

“Answer me this, Meatbrain. What is your name?”

I am under no compulsion to tell you my name. Anonymous political commentary is a long-standing tradition in America, going back at least as far as the publication of ‘Common Sense’. Anonymous political speech is also protected under law, as evidence by the Supreme Court’s 1995 decision in McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission.

You could choose to discuss the issues and the facts. That you prefer to focus on my identity rather than the simple questions I have asked tells us that honest, open discussion is something you abhor.

I don’t get how you can call Heidi a liar, when someone else admittedly messed with your trackback. If you wanna hold her responsible, fine, say that instead of saying she said something she never said. Your way doesn’t make sense and in fact makes YOU the liar.

Besides, your last week of posts haven’t even been interesting, I mean, why have you posted almost exclusively about some chick named heidi for over a week now? No one else cares! I mean, she’s obviously a hottie and all, but c’mon, six posts in a week? That’s not normal, that is becoming obsessive. Can’t you find something else to write about? Wouldn’t you rather tell what YOU think about issues, not what YOU think about HER? I think we can all guess what you think about her and what you’re thinking with. Meatbrain??? Yea…we get it. Grow up man!!

Kit wrote:

“I know how much you prefer hiding in email and blog comments, however. And yes, I mean to use the word ‘hiding’ ... you’d rather hide over here and throw stones from behind your little pseudonym.”

And then, directly beneath this, she wrote:

“Like I said, don’t bother coming over anymore. It’ll all just be deleted.”

This is why it’s futile trying to engage Kit, Heidi et al. in meaningful dialogue. Kit is clearly too stupid to appreciate the colossal irony inherent in going on at length about someone else’s online cowardice only to admit she’ll delete whatever that person writes on her blog. With this as a starting point, is it any wonder that comparative subtleties are completely beyond her comprehension? These wall-eyed assholes can’t think; they can only react. Which is precisely why they are all for the current administration’s war policies.

How did I lie, Meatbrain? It’s clear to anyone who can read that I didn’t.

What is clear, Heidi, is that the words I posted to your site were deliberately changed in an attempt to discredit me. Both you and Kit lack the moral competence to understand that it is wrong to lie about what others have said.

And, as always, you ignore the inconvenient questions:

What ‘jeopardy’ have I placed your family in, Heidi?

What ‘libel’ have I supposedly committed?

I can give you dozens of examples of how Heidi Thiess has lied, but she’d just lie and lie again. Why didn’t you show the US National Archive records in your hit-piece BROTHER AGAINST BROTHER that you did on us, Heidi? Facts are too stubborn for you to handle?

What you did showed up in Gary Linderer’s OPERATION WELCOMEHOME USA 2006 event, huh? Big crowd made up mostly of phonies like Linderer. I now know how you guys work. A phony meets another phony and gets that phony to cover his six, right?

You sure did libel me and my wife, Heidi Thiess! You called me a “racists,” remember and made fun of the injuries that I suffered in Vietnam, right? Does your husband know what you are doing?

Get a real job and stop playing at Blogging or what your site is more about regurgitating!

Heidi is a bad, bad tard.

Get Heidi Thiess & Jeanette “Kit” Jarrell BACK, if they can stand the heat?!

I have some questions to ask of them in a public forum instead of writing on their blog site where they change what you write, add to it, and lie about what they do. I have the facts they have rumors, commit fraud and act like thugs hiding behind their keyboards.

Keep the smoke and mirrors away from these two gals and expose them for what they really are, extremists, liars and racists – in their quest for fame.

Good luck on obtaining any sort of clearance when you apply for a job, Kit! I have had several (retired USA) Colonels and LTCs call me about your lying articles and I know why Heidi was asked to leave the Army.

Regards,
Don C. Hall

Rich,
Heidi is a smelly and a “bad [re]tard,” Rich. Well put for the two cowards that will not come on another blog site and defend what ills they have done in the past. Keep up the fire and heat on these two “turds,” ThinkingMeat.

Their days at Blogging are numbered.

Don C. Hall
http://www.i-served.com

Well, Madam Heidi is finished Blogging and left the outhouse to Kit.

Meatbrain, drop me an e-mail and I will send you some of the documents that I have located on this thief Jeanette “Kit” M. Jarrell. Seems she has a need to steal lots of people’s money and then go to an attorney to declare Chapter 13. Once a thief always a liar. You can judge people the way they spend money and the false claims they make in public records.

Come on out and play Kit! Or are you afraid of the hard, fair and balanced questions that I can slam at you in this neutral site?

While you are welcome to post comments here, Don, I have no interest in becoming entangled in your vendetta against Kit Jarrell. You have your own web site.

I will have no more interst in your “entangled vendetta against Kit Jarrell, amitted liar, etc…” either, Meatbrain. You have a problem with web sites vs. Blogs “gossip-sites”?

Signing off and leaving the “FACTS” on my web page. You may continue your rants or random thoughts in a Blog journal. Low numbers of responses here anyways. I was trying to juice it up for you with facts. Glad I didn’t send out a massive e-mai to the hundreds of friends about your Blog, but never mind. I was waiting to see how you swung, sorta speak, before doing so.
Don

PS: If it’s “meat” thinking or not, I kill it and eat.