Does it really get any more pathetic than that, in the ultra-right blogosphere?

...the subject of the post that engendered them is neither of those things.

“I wonder what part of my comment alerted that guardian?”

My guess is that you probably used either there, their or they’re in the correct context which completely incinerated the filter. Just for chuckles – in case a shred might be left dangling- try one more post using it’s and its in the same coherent sentence.

PS Drop me a line when afformentioned is completed. I want to see if their/there/they’re site is still up.

I could take his War on Christmas “I investigated the Post Office/religious stamp refusal story at my own LOCAL post office” lie. (The posting times show that he makes this claim on a Sunday evening, and he hadn’t been challenged on the post until late afternoon on Saturday. He’s not in the real world enough to realize post offices close?) I could tsk tsk over his self-inflicted panties-in-a-wad over the punctuation deficiencies of “go to war and kill veterans” in a working draft document for an African-American youth conference. But this one? No.

You see, during the Christmas break, Justin was home to try his hand at media fame: he called in to Rush Limbaugh. He got on, complained about his parents’ giving him grief, named his website, and then told the woeful tale of his uncle making liberal and/or teasing comments thereupon. He was graciously welcoming to all the Rush listeners who then visited to leave him glorious accolades as well as to those who maligned his family, with emphasis on his uncle. After that, I can’t stomach his dealing out “media whore” to anyone else.

You probably spelled over 50% of your words correctly. This tends to raise red flags among StopTheACLU.com’s bloggers.

I’m tempted to give the lying little turd a partial pass owing to his age, but he’s clearly not going to get any brighter or more honest with time—today’s clueless Justin is tomorrow’s hapless Jay. Anyone who doesn’t recognize Coulter’s comments as startlingly disgusting is stone dumb, shares Coulter’s personality disorders, or both.

Besides, don’t Justin’s comments sum up perfectly the banality and inanity of the religious right? He writes, “What these four left-wing widows do, is hit the media circuits, [and] spew left-wing garbage,” calls them “manupulative” and “media whores,” and states emphatically that overall he agrees with Coulter’s attack. But he throws this gem in as well: “I offer my prayers to them for their loss.” Does he really think these or any 9/11 widows want prayers from such a scathingly stupid source? Even if he were right about their motives, they’d be appalled at the hypocrisy of the “You’re a fucker, fuck you, you suck a big fuck, but I’ll keep you in my prayers!” scheme adhered to by so many of America’s fun-lovin’ faithful.

I wonder what part of my comment alerted that guardian?

“hypocritical”
“mind-reading garbage”
“media whores?!??!?”
“ignorant and restrictive”
“ad hominem”

I’ll bet on “ad hominem.” We probably give ourselves away with that one.

Sometimes they don’t do too bad, but on this one they have failed miserably.

One would surmise that neophytes like Justin would know better.