Kender again demonstrates an inability to grasp the core of the debate over Bush’s warrantless wiretaps:
Wiretaps are bad, right? Well then why I am giving a big tip o’ me tam to my bud Ric at Release the Hounds for a story out of Italy about terrorists that were not only caught planning attacks in the U.S., but caught with WIRETAPS???? Because WIRETAPS WORK!!!
No, Kender, wiretaps in and of themselves are not bad. Clearly, they can and do provide valuable intelligence on the actions and intent of terrorists. No mainstream politician has, to my knowledge, argued for a blanket ban on all wiretaps.
There’s a much bigger issue here, one that Kender and his ilk steadfastly refuse to perceive: Are we to become a society ruled by fear? Is the threat posed by the terrorists so huge, so overwhelming, so unmanageable that we must abandon two centuries of principles to save our skins? Is the President — any President — bound by laws, or is he a law unto himself?
FISA is the law of the land, and has been for decades. It lays out clear and careful guidelines for the use of wiretaps against US citizens. And make no mistake, such wiretaps are necessary. FISA exists so that domestic wiretaps can be carried out in a rational manner, consistent with the rights guaranteed under our Constitution.
The Bush administration has provided no believable rationale for bypassing the requirements of FISA. Instead, Bush has chosen to deliberately ignore the law. The most puzzling aspect is… why? What intelligence could the Bush administration reasonably have expected to gain with warrantless wiretaps that it could not have obtained with wiretaps that were authorized by a FISA warrant? Especially since, under FISA, it is permissible to apply for a warrant after the wiretap is in place?
No democracy can survive by throwing away its principles every time a threat arises. America cannot be destroyed by terrorists flying planes into buildings. Kender and his panic-stricken kind simply do not understand that the greatest danger to America comes from Americans who are willing to trade integrity, principles, and the rule of law for a little illusory safety.


3 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 21st, 2006 at 8:56 am
kender
Second, we are talking about international calls to and from people in America being monitored, and simply being within our borders should not protect a terrorist or their accomplices from being monitored as a matter of course.
Finally, trackback denied….earn your own traffic meathead.
January 21st, 2006 at 9:23 am
meatbrain
Then you’ll have to explain why expecting the President of the United States to obey the law of the land is in some way equivalent to hobbling the government from protecting us.
Straw man, again. FISA specifically allows for the monitoring of international calls to and from people in America. No one has claimed that simply being within our borders should protect a terrorist from being monitored.
When are you going to engage the real discussion, Kender?
Ah, yes… the indignant squeal of a child who is astonished to learn that someone would dare to publicly announce their disagreement with him.
January 21st, 2006 at 2:50 pm
kender