<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intelligent Design: an admission of stupidity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkingmeat.net/2005/11/24/id-admission-of-stupidity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkingmeat.net/2005/11/24/id-admission-of-stupidity/</link>
	<description>It's meat! And it thinks!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://thinkingmeat.net/2005/11/24/id-admission-of-stupidity/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 06:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingmeat.net/?p=4#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I just wish some IDer would finally come up with an "experiment" that would test the ID speculation. (I hesitate to call it even a hypothesis, and it sure as hell ain't a Theory).

That's just it - there is none. There is no conceivable experiment that could disprove ID or any of its manifestations. So why is it peddled as science? Because it is dishonest just like its cousin, creationism.

There. I feel better now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wish some IDer would finally come up with an &#8220;experiment&#8221; that would test the ID speculation. (I hesitate to call it even a hypothesis, and it sure as hell ain&#8217;t a Theory).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just it &#8211; there is none. There is no conceivable experiment that could disprove ID or any of its manifestations. So why is it peddled as science? Because it is dishonest just like its cousin, creationism.</p>
<p>There. I feel better now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
